bcspace wrote:
Milk before meat (or pearls before swine) is the only possibility.
Or that he did not want to talk about it because he was embarrassed by it, thought it made the Church look odd and strange. And he did it more than once. Face it, he was at best disingenuous about it. If he did not want to go into detail he could have said yes these are some of the more intricate and difficult teachings of the LDS Church. I would prefer not to explore them in a brief interview. But instead he hedged. Then he said in conference not to worry, he knew the doctrine and he was misquoted, but he wasn't.