I think we need to create a whole new thread for each of the files that she's uploaded. I feel like I'm living on planet bonkers.
I really feel for Joanna in this. Just read the interactions between Joanna and Rosebud and it seems to be very much a case of Joanna actually trying to find out what Rosebud's actual problem/concern is. And poor Joanna, when she restates what she understands the complaint to be to see if she understood it correctly (classic pink missionary guide), Rosebud annotates the file with Joanna asking a "leading question". As if there was some kind of coercion or manipulation going on. Rosebud is so evasive in some of these conversations, she can't seem to spit it out what it is that is the problem.
So not only are the files redacted, they are also annotated. Did JP add these annotations, or are these additions the handy work of Rosebud herself? Why do we need the annotations? Just give us the raw data, the court of public opinion will get to the bottom of it, don't you worry.
In her own words to Joanna: "there is a story here that shouldn't go public".
the day it opened. Her Facebook attorney fundraiser has a total of $530 out of the 15K goal. If/when she hires an attorney, I'm pretty sure that said attorney would tell their client to stop talking and stop posting. in my opinion it's far too late for that. Toothpaste/tube.
