3 grand principles of the scholar
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 10:27 pm
hi, i am new to apologetics and i just want to say that you guys are wrong and im going to tell you how the lord has guided the defenders of the faith and whats right? ok, im going to tell you now why. Doctor peterson from BYU has shown that most scholars ignore the Book of Mormon because they arent intersted in it so we don't know what their opinion is on it. So people are wrong to say that experts believe that its false because as the Book of Mormon predicts people are fools and wont take it seriously. Doctor hamblin from BYU has shown that SOME experts on south america have said bad things about the Book of Mormon but they don't count because they havnt studied it enough so even though they are experts in south america we can't trust them. But maybe someday an expert in south america will become interested enough and read the book a lot and still say something bad?? but as doctor reynolds from clairmount has shown real scholars don't attack other religions so if this ever happened it wouldn't count because that's not real scholraship.
only the experts at places like BYU fulfill the three criteria of scholorship that guarntees we get an opinion we can trust. only they simultaneously study the Book of Mormon without saying that it's wrong, only they have read the Book of Mormon enough to know what it says, and only they know enough about south america. and that this principle has been shown by combining the works of three independent witnesses is more proof that its right.
only the experts at places like BYU fulfill the three criteria of scholorship that guarntees we get an opinion we can trust. only they simultaneously study the Book of Mormon without saying that it's wrong, only they have read the Book of Mormon enough to know what it says, and only they know enough about south america. and that this principle has been shown by combining the works of three independent witnesses is more proof that its right.