Page 1 of 2
Who is the new owner of the board formerly known as FAIR?
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 12:53 am
by _Mister Scratch
Just curious what others thought.
Re: Who is the new owner of the board formerly known as FAIR
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 12:54 am
by _Runtu
Mister Scratch wrote:Just curious what others thought.
I think it's now a subsidiary of Halliburton.
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 12:55 am
by _Yoda
The owner of the new board is Dan G.
I'm not sure who "owned" the old board from a financial standpoint.
I would also say that although Dan G is the owner of the new board, that Juliann and Alan have "creative license".
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 12:57 am
by _Mister Scratch
liz3564 wrote:The owner of the new board is Dan G.
I'm not sure who "owned" the old board from a financial standpoint.
I would also say that although Dan G is the owner of the new board, that Juliann and Alan have "creative license".
Liz:
Do you know for a fact that it's Dan G.? Or is this an educated guess?
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 1:00 am
by _Yoda
Although I have seen nothing in writing, I think it's fairly safe to call this one fact. ;)
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 2:50 am
by _Brackite
Hi Mister Scratch,
I voted that it is Dan G. Why does Dan G. have to be such a jerk?
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 2:54 am
by _Mister Scratch
Brackite wrote:Hi Mister Scratch,
I voted that it is Dan G. Why does Dan G. have to be such a jerk?
Because he is a third-string apologist and knows it. Even the top dogs such as DCP and Bill Hamblin need the special protection of the moderating team. Were Dan G. to venture out into the deeper critical waters, such as this site or CTR, he would be up the creek without a paddle, so to speak. Thus, knowing that he is basically an ineffectual little wisp of an apologists, he consoles himself by banning people, spewing out false accusations, lying, manipulating posts, etc. In a word, Dan G. is guilty of: hubris.
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 2:55 am
by _Mister Scratch
Brackite wrote:Hi Mister Scratch,
I voted that it is Dan G. Why does Dan G. have to be such a jerk?
Because he is a third-string apologist and knows it. The poor fellow can barely assemble a complete, error-free sentence in English. Besides, even the top dogs such as DCP, Bill Hamblin, and David Stewart need the special protection of the moderating team. Were Dan G. to venture out into the deeper critical waters, such as this site or CTR, he would be up the creek without a paddle, so to speak. Thus, knowing that he is basically an ineffectual little wisp of an apologists, he consoles himself by banning people, spewing out false accusations, lying, manipulating posts, etc. In a word, Dan G. is guilty of: hubris.
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 2:59 am
by _Brackite
Thanks Mister Scratch!
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 4:14 am
by _moksha
Scratch, have you met and interacted with DanG? Did he use to post at FAIR under another name? What exactly is Allan Wyatt's connection? Who owns MAD's server and networking equipment? Has FAIR divested itself from its intellectual property claims of everything ever written on the message board?