Page 1 of 4

Who is Bond?

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 4:03 am
by _Bond...James Bond
Well Bond certainly isn't Rollo. Or an alter ego of Scratch. Or the cousin or adopted grandson of either Scratch or Rollo (but I will see you guys at the family reunion right?)

If your wondering what this is about, some of the FAIR guys are possibly considering thinking about me as a troll or maybe Rollo. Even though I only posted an introductory post. Please consider this the end of this press release.

Bond

edit: Shades feel free to delete this if you consider it worthless. Bond

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 3:07 pm
by _moksha
Are you now or have you ever been or will you ever comtemplate being Rollo?

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 3:21 pm
by _beastie
Where is this speculation taking place?

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 3:25 pm
by _rcrocket
Bond:

You flatter yourself. Virtually every one of your posts contains a misspelling; your initial post is no exception. At least Roll-the-Eyes-At-Anything-Good and Mr. Scratch-of-Hell's-Fame write and spell. Nobody could possible confuse you with them.

You need an education before you attempt to claim dominance of the internet. If you don't have one, try reading.

Plutarch

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 3:31 pm
by _Runtu
Plutarch wrote:Bond:

You flatter yourself. Virtually every one of your posts contains a misspelling; your initial post is no exception. At least Roll-the-Eyes-At-Anything-Good and Mr. Scratch-of-Hell's-Fame write and spell. Nobody could possible confuse you with them.

You need an education before you attempt to claim dominance of the internet. If you don't have one, try reading.

Plutarch


I like Bond. It's funny that I don't care much about people's typos on forums like this, given my profession. Life's too short to be pedantic or smug.

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 3:39 pm
by _beastie
Plutarch.

Do you consider commenting on spelling and typos to be contributing substance to conversations? You do it so frequently, while complaining about lack of substance on this board, that I'm left to wonder if we have a common view of what constitutes "substance".

Are you as critical of speech when engaging in conversation in "real life"? Do your contributions to conversations with real people in your life consist and pointing out grammatical errors?

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 4:03 pm
by _rcrocket
beastie wrote:Plutarch.

Do you consider commenting on spelling and typos to be contributing substance to conversations? You do it so frequently, while complaining about lack of substance on this board, that I'm left to wonder if we have a common view of what constitutes "substance".

Are you as critical of speech when engaging in conversation in "real life"? Do your contributions to conversations with real people in your life consist and pointing out grammatical errors?


Such hypocrisy! You all make fun of Wade and his spelling errors; and I can't have a little similar fun?

In answer to your questions:

Yes.
Yes, at work where I write for a living.
Yes. See prior answer.

I hope that was enlightening. This board lacks substance, if that helps.

P

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 4:47 pm
by _beastie
Such hypocrisy! You all make fun of Wade and his spelling errors; and I can't have a little similar fun?

In answer to your questions:

Yes.
Yes, at work where I write for a living.
Yes. See prior answer.

I hope that was enlightening. This board lacks substance, if that helps.


Oh, I see. Every poster on this board is responsible for the posts of every other person. by the way, I've never made fun of Wade's spelling errors.

So in your private life, outside of work, when you talk to people, do your responses consist solely of grammatical corrections? That's all that you offered here so far, even on threads that did, indeed, have substance.

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 6:28 pm
by _rcrocket
beastie wrote:Oh, I see. Every poster on this board is responsible for the posts of every other person.


I agree!

So in your private life, outside of work, when you talk to people, do your responses consist solely of grammatical corrections?


Didn't I just provide a response to that question? If not, "yes."

You seem like a smart person but your rhetoric and arguments are watered down with excessive and inconsistent typographical emphasis. Really smart and capable folks don't write that way.

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 6:55 pm
by _Bond...James Bond
Plutarch wrote:Bond:

You flatter yourself. Virtually every one of your posts contains a misspelling; your initial post is no exception. At least Roll-the-Eyes-At-Anything-Good and Mr. Scratch-of-Hell's-Fame write and spell. Nobody could possible confuse you with them.

You need an education before you attempt to claim dominance of the internet. If you don't have one, try reading.

Plutarch


Thank you Plutarch for the constructive criticism. I shall endeavor to become more like you in every way. You are my hero. I'm currently building a statue in your memory, so that future generations will know what a great person you are. You are truly Christlike.

Bond