Marriage? Temple or Not?
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 4627
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am
Marriage? Temple or Not?
Just wondering about people's marital status.
If not married but plan on getting married one way or the other, please drop a message.
I'm not married by the way.
Bond
If not married but plan on getting married one way or the other, please drop a message.
I'm not married by the way.
Bond
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 14117
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm
Ray A wrote:I'll get married again when Jesus returns.
I thought Jesus was already married :-)
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
--Louis Midgley
--Louis Midgley
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 922
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:32 pm
Ray A wrote:I'll get married again when Jesus returns.
I think you maybe single for a long long time....well unless you have the inside scoop as to when Jesus will be returning
But being single is not so bad....you can leave the seat up and no will care...
When I wake up I will be hungry....but this feels so good right now aaahhhhhh........
OUT OF MY MISERY wrote:Ray A wrote:I'll get married again when Jesus returns.
I think you maybe single for a long long time....well unless you have the inside scoop as to when Jesus will be returning
But being single is not so bad....you can leave the seat up and no will care...
LOL. No quite. My daughter will be, err, pissed off?
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 922
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:32 pm
Ray A wrote:OUT OF MY MISERY wrote:Ray A wrote:I'll get married again when Jesus returns.
I think you maybe single for a long long time....well unless you have the inside scoop as to when Jesus will be returning
But being single is not so bad....you can leave the seat up and no will care...
LOL. No quite. My daughter will be, err, pissed off?
Sorry she will be pissed off....man you will have to put up with her PMS....I as a woman understand how hard it is for my family of men to deal with my PMS...but we have survived...
When I wake up I will be hungry....but this feels so good right now aaahhhhhh........
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 14117
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm
Ray A wrote:OUT OF MY MISERY wrote:But being single is not so bad....you can leave the seat up and no will care...
LOL. No quite. My daughter will be, err, pissed off?
You know, the whole "toilet seat up" thing is, in my opinion, one of those common assumptions that breaks down under scrutiny.
For example, lots of people say, "No two snowflakes are ever alike." But when you think about it, how can anyone possibly claim that? Who is up there examining every single snowflake and comparing it to every other snowflake that ever fell? I'll bet a lot of snowflakes are exactly alike!
Similarly, lots of people say, "Einstein only used 10% of his brain." But, again, when you think about it, how can anyone possibly know that? Einstein is dead! How can anyone possibly know how much of his brain he did or didn't use? For all anyone knows, he used 100% of it!
So it goes with the "toilet seat up" phenomenon: Since when did God decree that toilet seats must remain down, and women ought to complain to men about leaving it up, and men must learn to leave the seat down, and must apologize when they leave it up? Why shouldn't toilet seats be expected to remain up, and men ought to complain to women about leaving it down, and women must learn to leave the seat up, and must apologize when they leave it down?
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
--Louis Midgley
--Louis Midgley
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 2455
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 6:09 pm
Dr. Shades wrote:So it goes with the "toilet seat up" phenomenon: Since when did God decree that toilet seats must remain down, and women ought to complain to men about leaving it up, and men must learn to leave the seat down, and must apologize when they leave it up? Why shouldn't toilet seats be expected to remain up, and men ought to complain to women about leaving it down, and women must learn to leave the seat up, and must apologize when they leave it down?
I've tried that argument with my wife - but it didn't work. Her logic was that we both use the toilet with the seat down. Only when I pee do I lift the seat up.
So, I use the toilet with the seat down 50% of the time. She uses it with the seat down 100% of the time. The toilet is only used with the seat up 25% of the time. Thus, the seat should default to the down position.
Oh, and married in the temple for me.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 4627
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am
Who Knows wrote:Dr. Shades wrote:So it goes with the "toilet seat up" phenomenon: Since when did God decree that toilet seats must remain down, and women ought to complain to men about leaving it up, and men must learn to leave the seat down, and must apologize when they leave it up? Why shouldn't toilet seats be expected to remain up, and men ought to complain to women about leaving it down, and women must learn to leave the seat up, and must apologize when they leave it down?
I've tried that argument with my wife - but it didn't work. Her logic was that we both use the toilet with the seat down. Only when I pee do I lift the seat up.
So, I use the toilet with the seat down 50% of the time. She uses it with the seat down 100% of the time. The toilet is only used with the seat up 25% of the time. Thus, the seat should default to the down position.
Oh, and married in the temple for me.
Who Knows,
LOL
At least you got your priorities straight, as shown by your emphasis in this post. ;)
Bond
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07