Sleeping Willow wrote:President Faust turned the ceremonial first shovelful of earth during the groundbreaking ceremony. After, he invited a young girl and boy to come help him with the digging. They not only came forward and assisted him, but the little girl also waited for him the next day at the Campinas regional conference to give him a hug of appreciation.
He emphasized the need for saints to sacrifice for temple building. He told how members in Argentina found ways to donate during the construction of the São Paulo Temple. They gave the gold from the dental work in their mouths to help pay on the temple. He said that he had purchased some of the gold fillings for more than the market price to impress upon the minds of congregations the nature of the sacrifice made by these members (Church News, 9 May 1998).
Given that the Church is so obviously in good financial shape, why was this request made? Removing fillings is a major dental health risk. What's next, asking members to sell a kidney? What if the Church offered "more than the market price" for the kidneys?
If it is about the "principle of sacrifice," couldn't Faust have asked members to sacrifice in a manner that wasn't so manifestly harmful to their health?
Some excellent points, and I do agree that this is one of the more embarrassing instances of abuse of Church finances in recent years. A bit further along in the thread, Catholic-MB-troll Pacman tries to argue that the gold fillings were given by their own free will, to which I say: Big deal. Another poster, "Brian's Mom," perhaps, pointed out that if this were the case, Faust should have stepped in and put a stop to it immediately, as soon as he found out. All in all, this incident, in my opinion, provides yet another reason why the Church's finances should be an open book.