DiscussMormonism.com

Here is the quote I'm going to address:

Chaos Today, 10:09 AM Post #41


Member: Moves Upon the Waters


Group: Senior Admin
Posts: 140
Joined: 4-October 06
Member No.: 3873



QUOTE(cksalmon @ Jan 1 2007, 10:52 PM)

I'm a bit out of touch. Did Kevin Graham get banned? I knew that Theophilus went down in a blaze of glory--or whatever--but I missed the Graham expungement.

Best.

CKS

He uses proxies to sneak back in when his screennames are blocked. Chaos does the honors and he has had a busy week. My apologies to those who are being subjected to his abuse. Chaos wants to keep it here so no one is confused about why we try to keep him off our board and so the outside parties he is involving can see what he is doing with their emails when we ask permission to leave them up. ~ Mods



Yes Kevin Graham is permanently banned from our site. However it seems his OCD is more then we can handle. Every time we ban one of his many sock puppets within the next day he has another one. At first he stated he had the "right" to be on this board since it was public and someone might actually talk about him, so he has the "right" to defend himself. However we mods made a stringent effort to make sure we dealt with anyone swiftly if his name came up, so this would not be an excuse for him. Im sorry to inform Kevin and everyone else this is not a public board, it is a private board and invitation to participate on it can be revoked at anytime or any reason. You run your own board Kevin you know this, no board owners should have to accept this malicious behavior.

Also to clear something up, no Shades its not a clean slate. Where did you get that idea? Was this another fantasy of your board members?

I don't have the time or to patience to continue to deal with this ilk. The following sock puppets will now be banned. And so they cannot respond I am closing the thread and this matter. They are as follows. Widdley, Madrid, Dartagnan, Cornholio, Will Heder and the many other future sock puppets they create.

Chaos
________________________________________________________________________

I'm not going to address anyone else but myself for I have been banned once again without cause and I intend to prove the weird thinking and innuendo that FAIR?MAD relies on to do it's bidding. Not because I care that I was banned once again, for as you'll see I wasn't even participating on that board, but because it's simply based on the principle of what this is about.

I'd like anyone out there who has the ability to search and verify the following to verify it on this thread.

My original screen name on FAIR was "widdley". In my esitmation I came on FAIR with that name for the first time ever in 2004. Someone please check that by searching on posts by "widdley".

I later registered on FAIR as Lady Sundancer in order to promote a new DVD by Kerry Shirts. I used Lady Sundancer because that was my long time screen name on ZLMB and so that people would recognize who I was. Some one please verify that for me.

Lady Sundancer stopped posting in October on account of the fact that a mod "scolded" me for saying something that was indeed posted by a TBM (Will?) and chose not to correct the statements, scold the TBM who actually made them or offer even a mininal apology to me. At that point I ceased participation on FAIR. I was apparently banned in the November 5 bannings. Some one please verify my last post on that board.

widdley hasn't posted on FAIR/MAD since 2005. I'd like someone to verify that.

So, the rightly named moderator Chaos chooses to ban me under the heading of "malicious behavior" and "revoke" my participation when I wasn't even participating!

The truth is that I haven't participated on FAIR/MAD since October. So what is the reason for the banning? Is it because I copied posts and put them on this board recently? Uh, I can still do that if I choose to.

So what is the banning (of both Lady Sundancer and now widdley) based on?

Jersey Girl

They have been busy over there...well Jersey Girl just keping posting over here..cause we are all reading it and enjoying making them squirm like little ants......

I was going to try a sock puppet over there but I am not sure it is worth my time...

OUT OF MY MISERY wrote:They have been busy over there...well Jersey Girl just keping posting over here..cause we are all reading it and enjoying making them squirm like little ants......

I was going to try a sock puppet over there but I am not sure it is worth my time...

I'd like to reiterate that I haven't participated on that board since October. In the moderator posts they say that Shades wasn't a "clean slate". Let me tell you something, Lady Sundancer was a clean slate and so was widdley. I commited no bannable offenses on that board, not once, not ever.

What this is about is that Juliann cannot hold up under scrutiny or challenge. I haven't even spoken on the board since October and yet my name was maligned as if I were actively participating in the challenge to Juliann.

Nonsense. Anyone with the ability to search can see that the banning of Lady Sundancer and now widdley is based on nothing at all.

I don't know how the others might feel or think about the bannings but speaking only for myself, I will not be slandered by the baseless innuendo they use to conduct business over there.

Jersey Girl

One more thing...this:

"and the many other future sock puppets they create. "

This implies that I created the screen name "widdley" in order to participate in the challenge to Juliann.

Again, widdley was my original screen name on FAIR (probably 2004) and then I registered as Lady Sundancer to promote a DVD by Kerry Shirts. So by their "reasoning" Lady Sundancer would have been a sock puppet for widdley!

I haven't participated in anything at all at all since October.

What they are doing over there is indecent.

Jersey Girl wrote:

OUT OF MY MISERY wrote:They have been busy over there...well Jersey Girl just keping posting over here..cause we are all reading it and enjoying making them squirm like little ants......

I was going to try a sock puppet over there but I am not sure it is worth my time...

I'd like to reiterate that I haven't participated on that board since October. In the moderator posts they say that Shades wasn't a "clean slate". Let me tell you something, Lady Sundancer was a clean slate and so was widdley. I commited no bannable offenses on that board, not once, not ever.

What this is about is that Juliann cannot hold up under scrutiny or challenge. I haven't even spoken on the board since October and yet my name was maligned as if I were actively participating in the challenge to Juliann.

Nonsense. Anyone with the ability to search can see that the banning of Lady Sundancer and now widdley is based on nothing at all.

I don't know how the others might feel or think about the bannings but speaking only for myself, I will not be slandered by the baseless innuendo they use to conduct business over there.

Jersey Girl

I'm surprised I haven't been banned. I asked to be banned when I was an apologist because I was taking up too much time there. I came back as an exmo, and I again withdrew because I thought I was becoming a little too combative. A couple of months ago, I thought I might go back because I felt the combativeness had passed, and I really do enjoy discussing the church. And then one of the mods ridiculed my return by mentioning my prior requests for banning and mocked my requests for civility. Oh, well. I've tried to be civil there and here. I don't know if going back with a different name is bannable or what. I'll just try to be nice.

I agree with you 150 Percent if not more...Like I say keep on posting I was not on that board long anough to know anyone over there that well..I was afraid of getting banned which I was..because they were so mad at me for having the screen name free from mo's in the first place..then I was Cowpies cheerleader...I and Charity shared a few unkind words...Morning star was nice to me...and Uncle Dale...

I was so careful when I worded my posts but one day I could not help myself and I was so bad...and they banned me until I think 2030 or something like that .....I was so mad at FAIR....They may have banned me from posting but I could still read the board because I had bookmarked it....so....

Just be careful...

I think what they are ultimately going to have to do is to totally privatize the board. That is, they are going to have to make it so only registered users can access any of the board content. Obviously, they have the Pundits Forum, which is meant to help with keeping the really sensitive material away from prying eyes, but if they truly want to accomplish this, my sense is that they are going to need to go fully private.

Mister Scratch wrote:I think what they are ultimately going to have to do is to totally privatize the board. That is, they are going to have to make it so only registered users can access any of the board content. Obviously, they have the Pundits Forum, which is meant to help with keeping the really sensitive material away from prying eyes, but if they truly want to accomplish this, my sense is that they are going to need to go fully private.

Great minds think alike, Scratch! :)

I've been saying this for months. Either they're a private board, or they aren't. They need to sh-- or get off the pot.

liz3564 wrote:

Mister Scratch wrote:I think what they are ultimately going to have to do is to totally privatize the board. That is, they are going to have to make it so only registered users can access any of the board content. Obviously, they have the Pundits Forum, which is meant to help with keeping the really sensitive material away from prying eyes, but if they truly want to accomplish this, my sense is that they are going to need to go fully private.

Great minds think alike, Scratch! :)

I've been saying this for months. Either they're a private board, or they aren't. They need to sh-- or get off the pot.

Yes. They clearly want people to be able to view the board, but they want *total control* over who those people are. I.e., they want to "show off"---as it were---to the public, and yet they are all too easily embarrassed by the critics. They ought to just close down the shop and make the board more like the little TBM club that it is at heart.

Mister Scratch wrote:They ought to just close down the shop and make the board more like the little TBM club that it is at heart.

Hmmm. Maybe they could call it tCoJCoLDS == The Club of Julianne/Chaos of Loosley-disguised Science.