Religion is Obsolete
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 2:59 am
I was recently trying to explain my beliefs to my betrothed, and I found it rather difficult. I ended up drawing graphs, pulling up various scientific websites, having her read several wikipedia articles on hallucinogens, entheogens, quotes from Timothy Leary, the Mayan Calendar, Zen Buddhism, it goes on and on and on and on. When I got to my testimony of Christ, I made a new connection that I wanted to share.
Jesus makes religion obsolete.
This is quite a large statement if taken out of context, so allow me to try putting it into the correct context - that of evolution.
Now, allow me to make a separation. I am not talking about evolution as most people understand it. The current evolutionary theory does not include the origin of life, or anything before that. It also doesn't try to explain anything supernatural such as consciousness, purpose, or afterlife. The evolution I will be speaking of is a much more universal concept -- I consider it the evolution of the one-consciousness, or of God.
Evolution, or creation, has always sped up exponentially. It took roughly 14 billion years for the planets to form. 1 billion years for life to form. 65 million years ago, mammals took over. 4-ish million years ago, primates came forth. 100,000 years ago, humans.
You can see each change came faster and faster. Then came the change that brought religions. about 4000bc, Laws and Nations came about. The laws of abraham and Moses were all the rage. These laws allowed nations to grow, it gave people a reason to protect eachother in much larger numbers than simple tribes. It worked quite well. Until about 40-400 ad. By this point, laws were getting a bit out of control. It was time for a new evolutionary step. Jesus came and "fullfilled the law." The christian movement took over, and for the next several hundred years the new idea that laws were a thing of the past seeped into everyone's mind. The step was completed come the 1700's, when the industrial revolution began.
At this point, Power took the place of Laws. Money has become the new ruling class, laws are archaic and mean nothing. Money and Power have taken over. Until the internet. 1992.
The speed of evolution is growing quite quickly. The advent of the internet has brought the new wave, that of Ethics. People cry out against laws, and they cry out against power. The 9/11 attacks, and the Enron scandal show this quite well. A cry for ethics, for doing what is right, regardless of laws is sweeping the nation. All the pro-drug documentaries, the more and more numerous protests, and the hard-left rule over the media show that the next rally cry is one above laws, and above power.
I'm probably explaining this horribly. http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=lungold There's a video about the mayan calendar, where he explains the events and levels of the evolution of consiousness much better than I am. The main point I'm trying to get across is this:
Jesus Fullfilled the law -- he preached personal power, and acting with your own mind and conscience. Why then, is the law so heavily preached in christian, and especially Mormon doctrines?
And another question: Does following the laws improve the power of your own mind and consciousness? Do they hold you back? Why or why not?
Jesus makes religion obsolete.
This is quite a large statement if taken out of context, so allow me to try putting it into the correct context - that of evolution.
Now, allow me to make a separation. I am not talking about evolution as most people understand it. The current evolutionary theory does not include the origin of life, or anything before that. It also doesn't try to explain anything supernatural such as consciousness, purpose, or afterlife. The evolution I will be speaking of is a much more universal concept -- I consider it the evolution of the one-consciousness, or of God.
Evolution, or creation, has always sped up exponentially. It took roughly 14 billion years for the planets to form. 1 billion years for life to form. 65 million years ago, mammals took over. 4-ish million years ago, primates came forth. 100,000 years ago, humans.
You can see each change came faster and faster. Then came the change that brought religions. about 4000bc, Laws and Nations came about. The laws of abraham and Moses were all the rage. These laws allowed nations to grow, it gave people a reason to protect eachother in much larger numbers than simple tribes. It worked quite well. Until about 40-400 ad. By this point, laws were getting a bit out of control. It was time for a new evolutionary step. Jesus came and "fullfilled the law." The christian movement took over, and for the next several hundred years the new idea that laws were a thing of the past seeped into everyone's mind. The step was completed come the 1700's, when the industrial revolution began.
At this point, Power took the place of Laws. Money has become the new ruling class, laws are archaic and mean nothing. Money and Power have taken over. Until the internet. 1992.
The speed of evolution is growing quite quickly. The advent of the internet has brought the new wave, that of Ethics. People cry out against laws, and they cry out against power. The 9/11 attacks, and the Enron scandal show this quite well. A cry for ethics, for doing what is right, regardless of laws is sweeping the nation. All the pro-drug documentaries, the more and more numerous protests, and the hard-left rule over the media show that the next rally cry is one above laws, and above power.
I'm probably explaining this horribly. http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=lungold There's a video about the mayan calendar, where he explains the events and levels of the evolution of consiousness much better than I am. The main point I'm trying to get across is this:
Jesus Fullfilled the law -- he preached personal power, and acting with your own mind and conscience. Why then, is the law so heavily preached in christian, and especially Mormon doctrines?
And another question: Does following the laws improve the power of your own mind and consciousness? Do they hold you back? Why or why not?