DiscussMormonism.com

Your ability to ask for "evidence" is wearing out your welcome. Specifically, I would like to see evidence for many ignorant points you assert. I do not ask for evidence because arguing with the retarded is neither fair to the rest of the forum nor yourself. So, since you decided to stop discussing things with me due to the fact I do not meet your silly requests for direct evidence I am obliged to tell you that you are a douche who does not know how to articulate an argument.

The pattern I have seen is that you will start a discussion, things don't go well for you, you claim authority in the subject (I was a blahblahblah, I knew a soand so and suchandsuch experience of mine tells me your wrong) and then you DEMAND proof from individuals making clear and concise arguments.

Frankly im calling you out as a troll with no argumentative ability. I did not answer your calls for evidence because I will not buy into your derailment of a discussion on matters of triviality.

More specifically, who are you? My gues sis your someone from FAIR/MAD. By the poor logic you use this doubly points to this.

Furthermore, how can you believe in an organization with so little proof to its truthfulness?

SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE OF YOUR ROOT CLAIM, that of the truthfulness of the gospel. Once you do this within the constraints of a logical conclusion I will supply you with all the evidence to my arguments that you need.

I'm not going to respond to someone who calls me a retard and a douche in the same post, especially when the etic nature of the criteria you have set down precludes reaching any kind of reliable conclusion. I will respond to you next week when I ask how many donations have been made this week by thehungersite.com. Hope you have a wonderful week.

VegasRefugee wrote:Your ability to ask for "evidence" is wearing out your welcome.

By the by, I was under the impression that all opinions were welcome here. Is this not true? Is it really just a front so you can claim moral superiority?

I see that asking for references is quite a shocking request for this Board.

P

Plutarch wrote:I see that asking for references is quite a shocking request for this Board.

P

No, asking for references is a method to derail the discussion and establish in the mind of the Mormon defender an easy out.

I want to see references for your statement that individuals ask for references Plutarch. And I wont answer any other questions until my idiotic request is fulfilled.

maklelan wrote:I'm not going to respond to someone who calls me a retard and a douche in the same post, especially when the etic nature of the criteria you have set down precludes reaching any kind of reliable conclusion. I will respond to you next week when I ask how many donations have been made this week by thehungersite.com. Hope you have a wonderful week.

Theres always an out for you, isn't there?

"I can't do that...that would mean that I would have to confront what you were asking! Instead, ill play derailment by demanding you answer my irrelevant question."

maklelan wrote:

VegasRefugee wrote:Your ability to ask for "evidence" is wearing out your welcome.

By the by, I was under the impression that all opinions were welcome here. Is this not true? Is it really just a front so you can claim moral superiority?

First and foremost its not my decision on who is allowed to post here. Second, all opinions are allowed here. Even irrational whiny chronic derailers.