Page 1 of 6
Who's on the MAD Chopping Block?
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 7:03 pm
by _Mister Scratch
Go ahead and place your bets!
Re: Poll: Who's on the MAD Chopping Block?
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 7:04 pm
by _harmony
Mister Scratch wrote:Go ahead and place your bets!
You need an "all of the above" choice.
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 7:06 pm
by _Mister Scratch
Hey, no biggie---write-in votes are welcome, too!
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 7:07 pm
by _harmony
Mister Scratch wrote:Hey, no biggie---write-in votes are welcome, too!
I vote for everyone except Zak. Zak will simply get a week in the corner with a dunce hat on his head.
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 7:10 pm
by _Mister Scratch
harmony wrote:Mister Scratch wrote:Hey, no biggie---write-in votes are welcome, too!
I vote for everyone except Zak. Zak will simply get a week in the corner with a dunce hat on his head.
Yes, poor Zak.
You know, it occurs to me that there ought to be some sort of prize involved in this little speculation we've got going.... Perhaps I should offer to do a dossier on the MADposter of the evictee's choice?
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 7:28 pm
by _Bond...James Bond
I voted Fortigurn. He seems to be less well known than The Dude and sethbag (and thus less likely to be noticed if banned).
Personally I still have my money on Nov 5 type mass purging.
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 7:49 pm
by _why me
None of the above.
I do think that if forigurn begins to play monkey in the middle with some of the posters he could get a suspension like suem. You see, one needs to be diplomatic in their posts espcially a critic. But also a LDS poster too. Now hammer was suspended for playing monkey in the middle too. And so you see, it is quite fair at MAD.
Sethbag is not going to get suspended. He is my favorite critic friend at MAD. And he is engaging in discussion and doesn't badger the posters.
The dude, is not going to get banned. He is quite intelligent and knows how to handle himself when he gets in a pickle and he is cool like a cucumber.
Zak has not done anything wrong to get banned. However, once he reaches 11,000 the mods may give him a two week vacation from the boards for mental health reasons.
And so the next banning will come when a critic poster begins to flame LDS posters and adds no substance. And I do believe I know who it may be.
Now of course, these are only my speculations...and I won't bet my shoes on it. But...lets see what the future will bring...life is interesting isn't it?
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 7:58 pm
by _Yoda
Why Me wrote:And so the next banning will come when a critic poster begins to flame LDS posters and adds no substance. And I do believe I know who it may be.
Well, by all means, don't keep us in suspsense! Who do you think it will be? Scratch said that write-in's were welcome. ;)
I voted for The Dude, by the way. Without DCP on the board regularly to balance him, I think he may be seen as too much of a threat.
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 8:04 pm
by _moksha
We know for sure that Dr. Peterson and Juliann are safe.
When unrighteous dominion raises its head, who knows were or how it will strike. Have any particular posters been rubbing the mod's hackles the wrong way?
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 8:09 pm
by _moksha
why me wrote: And so the next banning will come when a critic poster begins to flame LDS posters and adds no substance. And I do believe I know who it may be.
Care to share? Those dang critic posters flaming the LDS posters! Adding no substance though, is usually a code term for saying stuff we don't like.