Which Critic Will Be the Next to Go?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.

Who will be next to get the MAD axe?

 
Total votes: 0

_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Which Critic Will Be the Next to Go?

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Part three in an ongoing soap opera! Write in votes, as always, are welcome.
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

I said Bach but it could be anyone. The newcomer Oracle also has a good chance.

by the way: Has anyone ever put together a list of the people banned from MAD? If you start digging in the oldest threads over there you see tons of people banned. The list of exiles must be in the hundreds.
Last edited by Anonymous on Mon Feb 26, 2007 1:38 am, edited 2 times in total.
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
_gramps
_Emeritus
Posts: 2485
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:43 pm

Post by _gramps »

Bach and I are going at it with Pahoran as I write this. (A thread started by why me nearly at the top of first page. Something about Hinckley's 80's speech.) With Pahoran involved, there is always a chance of red moderator's warnings and bannings.
I detest my loose style and my libertine sentiments. I thank God, who has removed from my eyes the veil...
Adrian Beverland
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

gramps wrote:Bach and I are going at it with Pahoran as I write this. (A thread started by why me nearly at the top of first page. Something about Hinckley's 80's speech.) With Pahoran involved, there is always a chance of red moderator's warnings and bannings.


One of you needs to point out the fact that the ban on interracial marriage has never been publicly or "officially" lifted.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Bond...James Bond wrote:by the way: Has anyone ever put together a list of the people banned from MAD?


Yes. See: The FAIR/MA&D Exiles weblog
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_skippy the dead
_Emeritus
Posts: 1676
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 5:39 am

Post by _skippy the dead »

gramps wrote:Bach and I are going at it with Pahoran as I write this. (A thread started by why me nearly at the top of first page. Something about Hinckley's 80's speech.) With Pahoran involved, there is always a chance of red moderator's warnings and bannings.


I popped into the thread early, but since you and Bach have articulated pretty much the same responses I would have, I've left the jousting in your able hands. I may pop back in to point out that for me, an "apology" is not that big a deal. Correcting (explicitly) the doctrine that resulted from the "blemishes" would be more appropriate.
I may be going to hell in a bucket, babe / But at least I'm enjoying the ride.
-Grateful Dead (lyrics by John Perry Barlow)
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

Dr. Shades wrote:
Bond...James Bond wrote:by the way: Has anyone ever put together a list of the people banned from MAD?


Yes. See: The FAIR/MA&D Exiles weblog


Duh. *Forehead slap*. Forgot about that. You better get back in the saddle Shades. Looks like some more people have gotten the axe since your last entry. ;)
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
_gramps
_Emeritus
Posts: 2485
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:43 pm

Post by _gramps »

Mister Scratch wrote:
gramps wrote:Bach and I are going at it with Pahoran as I write this. (A thread started by why me nearly at the top of first page. Something about Hinckley's 80's speech.) With Pahoran involved, there is always a chance of red moderator's warnings and bannings.


One of you needs to point out the fact that the ban on interracial marriage has never been publicly or "officially" lifted.


Well, I'd be happy to do that, if I were up to date on that stuff. However, it's not my area of concern right now. Why don't you point me to some things I should read? Thanks in advance.
I detest my loose style and my libertine sentiments. I thank God, who has removed from my eyes the veil...
Adrian Beverland
_gramps
_Emeritus
Posts: 2485
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:43 pm

Post by _gramps »

skippy the dead wrote:
gramps wrote:Bach and I are going at it with Pahoran as I write this. (A thread started by why me nearly at the top of first page. Something about Hinckley's 80's speech.) With Pahoran involved, there is always a chance of red moderator's warnings and bannings.


I popped into the thread early, but since you and Bach have articulated pretty much the same responses I would have, I've left the jousting in your able hands. I may pop back in to point out that for me, an "apology" is not that big a deal. Correcting (explicitly) the doctrine that resulted from the "blemishes" would be more appropriate.


Well, please pop in again. The more the merrier. rcrocket is joining in, too. Your point about an apology is well-taken and you should come on and make it.

Edited to add: Hey! I'm a Star B now. Cool.
I detest my loose style and my libertine sentiments. I thank God, who has removed from my eyes the veil...
Adrian Beverland
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

gramps wrote:
Mister Scratch wrote:
gramps wrote:Bach and I are going at it with Pahoran as I write this. (A thread started by why me nearly at the top of first page. Something about Hinckley's 80's speech.) With Pahoran involved, there is always a chance of red moderator's warnings and bannings.


One of you needs to point out the fact that the ban on interracial marriage has never been publicly or "officially" lifted.


Well, I'd be happy to do that, if I were up to date on that stuff. However, it's not my area of concern right now. Why don't you point me to some things I should read? Thanks in advance.


That's just it, Gramps---there isn't anything to read. The ban has never been formally lifted. (Interracial couples have been sealed in the temples, of course, but it's unclear how this is doctrinally possible.)
Post Reply