DiscussMormonism.com

Part three in an ongoing soap opera! Write in votes, as always, are welcome.

I said Bach but it could be anyone. The newcomer Oracle also has a good chance.

by the way: Has anyone ever put together a list of the people banned from MAD? If you start digging in the oldest threads over there you see tons of people banned. The list of exiles must be in the hundreds.

Bach and I are going at it with Pahoran as I write this. (A thread started by why me nearly at the top of first page. Something about Hinckley's 80's speech.) With Pahoran involved, there is always a chance of red moderator's warnings and bannings.

gramps wrote:Bach and I are going at it with Pahoran as I write this. (A thread started by why me nearly at the top of first page. Something about Hinckley's 80's speech.) With Pahoran involved, there is always a chance of red moderator's warnings and bannings.

One of you needs to point out the fact that the ban on interracial marriage has never been publicly or "officially" lifted.

Bond...James Bond wrote:by the way: Has anyone ever put together a list of the people banned from MAD?

Yes. See: The FAIR/MA&D Exiles weblog

gramps wrote:Bach and I are going at it with Pahoran as I write this. (A thread started by why me nearly at the top of first page. Something about Hinckley's 80's speech.) With Pahoran involved, there is always a chance of red moderator's warnings and bannings.

I popped into the thread early, but since you and Bach have articulated pretty much the same responses I would have, I've left the jousting in your able hands. I may pop back in to point out that for me, an "apology" is not that big a deal. Correcting (explicitly) the doctrine that resulted from the "blemishes" would be more appropriate.

Dr. Shades wrote:

Bond...James Bond wrote:by the way: Has anyone ever put together a list of the people banned from MAD?

Yes. See: The FAIR/MA&D Exiles weblog

Duh. *Forehead slap*. Forgot about that. You better get back in the saddle Shades. Looks like some more people have gotten the axe since your last entry. ;)

Mister Scratch wrote:

gramps wrote:Bach and I are going at it with Pahoran as I write this. (A thread started by why me nearly at the top of first page. Something about Hinckley's 80's speech.) With Pahoran involved, there is always a chance of red moderator's warnings and bannings.

One of you needs to point out the fact that the ban on interracial marriage has never been publicly or "officially" lifted.

Well, I'd be happy to do that, if I were up to date on that stuff. However, it's not my area of concern right now. Why don't you point me to some things I should read? Thanks in advance.

skippy the dead wrote:

gramps wrote:Bach and I are going at it with Pahoran as I write this. (A thread started by why me nearly at the top of first page. Something about Hinckley's 80's speech.) With Pahoran involved, there is always a chance of red moderator's warnings and bannings.

I popped into the thread early, but since you and Bach have articulated pretty much the same responses I would have, I've left the jousting in your able hands. I may pop back in to point out that for me, an "apology" is not that big a deal. Correcting (explicitly) the doctrine that resulted from the "blemishes" would be more appropriate.

Well, please pop in again. The more the merrier. rcrocket is joining in, too. Your point about an apology is well-taken and you should come on and make it.

Edited to add: Hey! I'm a Star B now. Cool.

gramps wrote:

Mister Scratch wrote:

gramps wrote:Bach and I are going at it with Pahoran as I write this. (A thread started by why me nearly at the top of first page. Something about Hinckley's 80's speech.) With Pahoran involved, there is always a chance of red moderator's warnings and bannings.

One of you needs to point out the fact that the ban on interracial marriage has never been publicly or "officially" lifted.

Well, I'd be happy to do that, if I were up to date on that stuff. However, it's not my area of concern right now. Why don't you point me to some things I should read? Thanks in advance.

That's just it, Gramps---there isn't anything to read. The ban has never been formally lifted. (Interracial couples have been sealed in the temples, of course, but it's unclear how this is doctrinally possible.)