Romney is officially the current frontrunner

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Mercury
_Emeritus
Posts: 5545
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 2:14 pm

Romney is officially the current frontrunner

Post by _Mercury »

Well ladies and gentlemen, it appears that the fundreaising figures are in and Romney was able to scare up the most money for a republican cantidate. The war chest is stocked and ready to roll. Can he beat the left though? I doubt it. Hillary has raised 1/3 more funds, a considerable difference.

So, will romney get the GOP nomination now? I think its likely. Not only that, but when he loses, will the wolves turn to his Mormonism as a reason for their failure? Will the Hawk Neocons last breath be a whimper from romney as he gives his concession speech? I sure hope so.
And crawling on the planet's face
Some insects called the human race
Lost in time
And lost in space...and meaning
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Post by _moksha »

When the billionaires come on board, the Republicans will always be able to outspend the Democrats. They are the party of the rich. With those bucks they have promoted and succeeded in electing very deficient candidates, who support their policies.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_ozemc
_Emeritus
Posts: 397
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 3:21 pm

Post by _ozemc »

I don't think Romney can get the nomination.

Sure, he's raising money now, but, as has been pointed out, once all the different beliefs of mormonsim come to light, people will probably think twice.

Personally, I like Fred Thompson, and Duncan Hunter.
"What does God need with a starship?" - Captain James T. Kirk

Most people would like to be delivered from temptation but would like it to keep in touch. - Robert Orben
_TAK
_Emeritus
Posts: 1555
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 4:47 pm

Post by _TAK »

I am curious to know where Romney's money is coming from..
_Trinity
_Emeritus
Posts: 426
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 12:36 pm

Post by _Trinity »

His billionaire circle of friends? Romney's personal wealth is quite robust, and he hangs out with the rich kids.

Oh, and don't forget the Mormons!
"I think one of the great mysteries of the gospel is that anyone still believes it." Sethbag, MADB, Feb 22 2008
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Mormon or not, I hope Romney wins the Presidency. The lawyers and professional politicians have done enough damage; it's time for a successful businessman with fiscal savvy to take the helm.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Pokatator
_Emeritus
Posts: 1417
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:38 pm

Post by _Pokatator »

Romney doesn't really scare me.

What scares me is Hillary. A term with Hillary would be a least 4 years of screeching and nagging and would remind me of an eternity sentence with my ex-wife.
_The Dude
_Emeritus
Posts: 2976
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:16 am

Post by _The Dude »

I have nothing against voting for a Mormon. But with Romney's stance on abortion, gay rights, and stem cell research, he may as well be an evangelical christian. He probably thinks intelligent design should be taught in schools (does anyone know if he's made a comment about this? I'm just guessing and projecting from his other wacko-christian stances). I think he's trying to impress the EVs to get elected.

I would actually like to vote for a Mormon guy like Romney who wasn't such a social right winger.

As for Hillary, my only problem with her is that so many other people have a problem with her. If she did get elected, it would be four more years of screeching and nagging from Republicans who bear her such irrational hatred. The country is divided enough as it is. Obama would be better maybe. Or the governor of New Mexico.

Oh yeah, I almost forgot about John Roberts. That guy is a joke.

Edit: oops, I meant John Edwards.
Last edited by Doctor Steuss on Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_Alter Idem
_Emeritus
Posts: 784
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 7:24 pm

Post by _Alter Idem »

moksha wrote:When the billionaires come on board, the Republicans will always be able to outspend the Democrats. They are the party of the rich. With those bucks they have promoted and succeeded in electing very deficient candidates, who support their policies.


The Democrats have done a good job of hiding the fact they they are rich too. Face it, both parties are the "parties of the rich"--you forget about Kerry? Gore? Edwards? What about practically ALL of Hollywood and the elite left? They ARE the party.

If the Democrats really were poor, there would only be one party in this country, and that's not the case.
_Alter Idem
_Emeritus
Posts: 784
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 7:24 pm

Post by _Alter Idem »

The Dude wrote:As for Hillary, my only problem with her is that so many other people have a problem with her. If she did get elected, it would be four more years of screeching and nagging from Republicans who bear her such irrational hatred. The country is divided enough as it is. Obama would be better maybe. Or the governor of New Mexico.



Hey, it would only be fair, after having to listen to eight years of the screeching, nagging and irrational hatred directed at Pres. Bush. I'd say turnaround is fair-play.

Obama doesn't have a chance as long as he's up against Hillary--she's got a better chance at beating a Republican candidate than he does--I believe he's too left wing for the centrists. Besides, I think he needs more experience--dare I say, "gravitas"? :)
Post Reply