Page 1 of 5
Apologetic defense of Don Imus
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 5:19 pm
by _SatanWasSetUp
Just for fun, If Don Imus hired FARMS/FAIR to defend him, what kind of creative defenses would the employ? For those who haven't been watching the news, Don Imus is a syndicated talk radio host who jokingly referred to the Rutger's Women's basketball team as "Nappy headed ho's." Here are some possible defenses that FAIR/FARMS could provide.
1) There is no evidence that they AREN'T Nappy Headed ho's.
2) In some ancient African tribes, the term ho means beautiful African Princess. Why would the Rutgers team be offended by this? (vague and obscure source provided)
3) A hoe is an instrument used in gardening. It removes the weeds so that useful plants such as vegetables and flowers can grow. A hoe is a useful tool to provide beauty to the landscape. Calling someone a hoe is a compliment.
4) Don Imus was just speaking his opinion, it wasn't official doctrine. (Not sure how this helps Don Imus though)
Any other creative ideas?
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 5:22 pm
by _Yoda
I've got one!
"Since we weren't there when the comment was made, we can never be sure exactly how he meant it. Only God knows the truth. It is our job to be faithful and give him the benefit of the doubt."
;)
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 5:23 pm
by _skippy the dead
How 'bout:
(1) We're imposing our present day values on something that happened last week. Last week it was socially acceptable to use those terms. We have no right to judge what happened in the past.
(2) You're a race-baiter to even bring this up. Race baiter!
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 5:36 pm
by _The Dude
Imus' remark was designed to test our faith and separate the wheat from the chaff. In the early days of talk radio, many of the very elect fell away because of such trials, and we should expect further trials of our faith. We are in the last days of talk radio. The end is near. We must endure to the end. I have a testimony that Don Imus... blah, blah, blah. In the name of Rush Limbaugh, amen.
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 5:50 pm
by _guy sajer
Imus' remarks are based on notes taken by his scribe. Most likely the scribe made an error in recording what Imus actually said, or he did not adequately reflect the context of his remarks. Since we cannot know what Imus actually said, and since the spirit has told me he's really a good guy, I do not believe he actually said this.
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 5:53 pm
by _grayskull
To convict Imus is to commit the fallacy of presentism. Everyone knows that these kinds of comments are standard fare amongst his crew.
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 5:57 pm
by _Analytics
Only superlatively despicable hatemongers brings up this tired bit of hate propaganda, which is no doubt why you did it. This comment was taken completely out of context for the malicious purpose of race baiting. As you know.
Regards,
Analytics
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 6:04 pm
by _beastie
Only superlatively despicable hatemongers brings up this tired bit of hate propaganda, which is no doubt why you did it. This comment was taken completely out of context for the malicious purpose of race baiting. As you know.
Regards,
LOL! I think it can mean nothing good about my use of time that I immediately recognized this "author". ;)
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 6:04 pm
by _guy sajer
This is the same tired criticism of Imus that critics have been making for years. We've already addressed this issue.
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 6:15 pm
by _beastie
ZZZzzzzzzzzzz
(image of beating dead horse)
Or here's another one:
We all know why critics can't leave this alone.