DCP has every right to defend himself and to protest poor treatment, as do his friends. That isn't the issue here, Ray. I stress that I have never said otherwise, nor have I ever claimed the exmormons are better behaved than Mormons. I have repeatedly stated that both sides are prone to this problem.
The issue is whether or not people who criticize DCP in a mean-spirited fashion are, as you claimed, engendering general hate against Mormons, and most likely will inspire some sort of acts of violence in the future.
If you
really believed Mormons are at serious risk due to RFM, you'd do something other than complain about it here, to people who rarely, if ever, participate there. If you
really believed people can be at risk due to inflammatory language of others on internet boards, then you would be concerned about ex-mormons, too - unless, of course, we're less than human somehow, and deserve it, (an idea Jesus would be very angry about, since he believed that each one of the lost was important and dear) or Mormons are incapable of acts of violence. (an idea history itself would debunk without any further comment)
You're on a mission, aren't you, and let me tell you, like Pahoran, I hold all of you in utter contenpt.
My only "mission" is to demonstrate how inane and, to use your own words,
nutty your comments have been. You apparently are choosing to interpret my negative attention as some sort of indication of my feelings about Mormonism. It's not. My negative attention is due to the nutty (again, to use your own word) things you've been saying.
You engaged in obvious hyperbole that completely fails tests of logic, as this thread has demonstrated. If I say the exact same thing about future, potential violence against exmormons due to your inflammatory rhetoric towards me, you (rightly) call it nutty.
That was my entire point. It is nutty, Ray. Your behavior certainly can indicate something about you, yourself, but it, in the context it takes place, does not indicate something about engendering wider-scaled hatred against ex-mormons, to the point where they will need an anti-defamation group and will suffer acts of violence simply for being ex-mormons. Yet this is exactly what you have claimed will happen in response to exmormon hyperbole.
Every time this point has been clearly demonstrated to you, you dodge it. You talk about something else, like my personal character. Or you've said vague things like everyone but me sees the difference. Or simply declaring you are leaving the cesspool (how many times is that now?)
You can't logically defend your point because it is illogical.