wenglund wrote:From what I can gather from some of the responses to this question thus far, part of the reason some maintain an interest or presense at MA&D is because it gives them an opportunity to come back over here and brag about how supposedly superior in various ways they are to the folks over there. Evidently, it is about making oneself feel better about oneself.
This is interesting because, to a certain extent, it's true. I have stopped myself on more than one occasion from running back here to "brag" because my motive in doing so would be strictly self-aggrandizing. Still, I have frequently pointed people to threads there, and my motives in doing so are at least partly selfish: nobody there sympathizes with my best arguments, and I at least want somebody to appreciate all the hard work I put into crafting them. Of course, I also want to just share information with people, so the motive isn't entirely selfish. Or at least, that's what I tell myself. One rule I do try to follow is that I don't "brag" at the expense of posters there. Of course, I don't always succeed even on this point, as when I get really frustrated with juliann and just have to tell the world.
All of this hints at the bigger question of why we participate on a forum at all, or even why we do anything in the world. Are there any truly altruistic motivations? Aren't all motivations inherently self-aggrandizing to some degree? I can see a distinction between self-enlargement that is pursued constructively vs. that which is pursued destructively (not to mention that which is masked behind an altrustic facade vs. that which is overt and unabashed), but ultimately I wonder if all our actions might not be explained as an attempt to "feel better about oneself".
It's an almost depressing philosophical question, this question of the possibility of true altruism. What say you, Wade? Is it possible to participate on MADB without engaging in self-aggrandizement? And, while I acknowledge that some behaviors are better than others, in what do you think this "betterness" is grounded? Is it merely an evolutionary or social convention that we prefer people who behave a certain way?
-CK