Will Schryver wrote:Oh, I know that they’re claiming to have had 82! users looking in on June 4th, but I don’t believe it for a second! That stat has been doctored by the webmaster to artificially pump up their sagging self-image. I’ve checked things out there often enough to know that there are never more than a handful of spectators, and even fewer actual participants.
This is really something I don't get about W. Schryver. Sometimes he appears interested in genuine dialog, and sometimes he makes universal statements like this ("That stat has been doctored..."), devoid of any substantiation re: the facts. How does one make a definite statement of fact like this when one does not have the foggiest whether or not his statement is true? One is apparently supposed to take his word for it, though he is manifestly not in a position to know the actual truth of the matter.
That's what bugs me:
"X is the case."
"How do you know?"
"I just do, based on personal experience. X is definitely the case."
"But, you really don't
know that X is the case, you just believe X to be the case, right?"
"No, I do know. I just stated that I know X to be the case. The stats are doctored."
"But, how do you know this?"
"I know it to be the case, based on personal experience. The stats are doctored."
"But, how do you know?"
"I already said I know."
Wha?!
Perhaps Will can clarify his statement of apparent fact. I do believe he is intellectually capable of defending a thesis (he's a smart guy and I have seen many comments by him I thought worthy of sustained interaction), though perhaps not this one (and I could be wrong). I just don't see it, yet. Will? How do you really claim to know this? Doesn't the inherently speculative nature of your apparent belief (without any definitive justification that I can see) tend to preclude your opining on this matter? If not, why not? Are we to take your opinion (presented as fact) as fact? If so, why? Do you have access to the relevant statistics? If not, why would one accept your unsubstantiated opinion based on personal experience (but stated as unequivocal fact) as fact?
Best.
CKS