Page 1 of 4

Analysis of the upcoming "Truth Restored" campaign

Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:57 pm
by _Dr. Shades
In the Terrestrial Forum, Polygamy Porter made reference to the church's newest campaign, "Truth Restored." He's totally convinced that it'll backfire. You can see two apostles (Scott and Ballard) and two Seventies explain the program on video here.

For those who don't want to watch the video (It's almost 39 minutes long), it explains that the church is about to go full-force on an all-out media blitz: Billboards, magazine ads, T.V. spots, and Internet banner ads will all be utilized. They'll all focus on the big questions that have plagued mankind since the beginning of time, such as "Does God care about me?" and "Why am I here?", etc. The ads will then show the church's name and the url Mormon.org which will be redesigned to provide the answers asked in the ads.

The GAs in the video then essentially ask the members to be prepared for inquiries about the church, then request them to act as resources for further information, missionary referrals, or referrals to Mormon.org. They also ask the members to be sure to greet and welcome any curious visitors who arrive in church.

One interesting thing they're going to do is provide referral cards which members can hand to inquirers and other acquaintances. The cards will have the church's name and, again the Mormon.org URL.

Phase II, which will come about a few months later, will feature (in TV ads, perhaps?) testimonies from recent converts.

Sounds reasonable to me. Every religious and/or business entity must grow to survive, so I'm not at all surprised that they'd embark on an aggressive promotion campaign such as this. The only surprise for me is that they didn't do it sooner. If I were to venture a guess, I'd say it's because they're finally finding out that tracting just isn't effective.

Another thing which impressed me was how little effort they asked from the members this time. Up 'till now, they've browbeaten the missionaries and the members into simply working harder (not smarter) to get people into the church by whatever means necessary. Now, however, it looks like they finally decided to pony up a little of their own money and/or resources to help the members finally do what's always been demanded of them. Either that, or they've finally figured out that the endless guilt trips simply aren't doing the job.

Again, Polygamy Porter seems dead-set that the program will backfire. Me, I'm not so sure. Sure, lots of people will become exposed to Mormonism as a result of this, but the key ingredient of the program--looking for more information on the Internet--might have the opposite effect in a great majority of cases. In other words, people initially going to Mormon.org for information might wind up doing an additional google search, then that'll be all she wrote.

So, in the end, will it result in more new members? Not a doubt in my mind. However, I believe that many, many more people will discover the truth about it instead, and as a result will be non-Mormon not due to ignorance this time but due to choice. I also believe that many formerly believing Mormons will figure out that there's information about their church on the Internet to be had, and like the investigators will do one google search too many and leave.

Therefore, MY PREDICTION IS THIS: I think the campaign will result in a gain of many new faces, but a loss of many old ones. I'm sure it will result in a net positive growth for the church overall, but far, far smaller than what the leaders hope for and way, way lower than the monetary investment was worth.

Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2007 12:08 am
by _moksha
There are so many inactive members of all religious persuasions. This group has grown quite a bit with an upward trend. Obviously their spiritual needs are not being addressed (although I am uncertain if they perceive they have unmet spiritual needs). It also seems like they could be a prime target group. What does the LDS Church have to offer this group? Will this new PR campaign address their needs and desires?

Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2007 12:13 am
by _Dr. Shades
moksha wrote:There are so many inactive members of all religious persuasions. . . What does the LDS Church have to offer this group?


Probably nothing, or else they wouldn't still be inactive.

Will this new PR campaign address their needs and desires?


No. It's about earning & retaining new converts, not reactivating the inactives.

Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2007 12:14 am
by _Jersey Girl
They'll all focus on the big questions that have plagued mankind since the beginning of time, such as "Does God care about me?" and "Why am I here?", etc.


EV publishing companies have been doing this for as long as I can remember. I don't see why this is a big deal.

Jersey Girl

Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2007 12:24 am
by _Lucretia MacEvil
Is it just me or was there something off about these four guys sitting in the dark and plotting to illuminate the world? And for all their being sedate[d] old mumblebutts, was there a certain air of desperation about them?

Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2007 12:32 am
by _Dr. Shades
Jersey Girl wrote:EV publishing companies have been doing this for as long as I can remember. I don't see why this is a big deal.


It's a big deal for two reasons: First, because it's the first time the Mormons have done it, second, because EV publishing companies were only dropping off pamphlets; they weren't buying up billboards, buying up radio slots, buying up T.V. spots, buying up magazine ads, and buying up Internet banner ads.

Oh yeah, I had one more thought I neglected to mention: As for their air of desperation, I think the writing is on the wall. I know, and I think they know, that if this doesn't work, then nothing will. If this doesn't work, I'm quite sure they realize that they'll have to accept that the halcyon days are over and they'll have to content themselves with the current low rate of growth from here on out.

Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2007 12:37 am
by _truth dancer
I've been saying for some time now, (since Bushman's book), that the church has got some good PR folks working hard!

I think they are doing all the right things to get people to join the church.

Think of ANY organization that wants more members, more sales, more participants... you flood the market with adds, ask questions for which they want answers, appeal to emotion, focus on feeling, and completely emphasize how others have bought this product and love it.. you know, endorsements (think testimonies).

This PR group is doing everything right, IMHO!

I agree that I have been surprised the church has not jumped on this sooner... but I think they are just now (the last 3-5 years) realizing that there are some issues that need addressing. in my opinion, they will not actually address the issues unless they have no choice but will just refocus.

My guess is they will slowly but surely put the Book of Abraham behind them... they will surely remove the year long waiting period for sealings if a civil marriage is performed, they will continue to have members (as opposed to the church) do the innoculating (think Bushman, apologists, PBS special, etc), probably alter the garmet requirements, change the TRI, ...etc. etc. etc.

In other words, the PR dept will advise on what needs to happen to have people be comfortable with the church.

Personally, if I were the prophet, I would do exactly the same thing... well, not exactly... I would offer some apologies for past hurtful practices, let go of some of the hurtful teachings still alive and well, be upfront about the true history, condemn what has been hurtful in the past, etc. etc.

:-)

~dancer~

Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2007 12:40 am
by _Jersey Girl
It's a big deal for two reasons: First, because it's the first time the Mormons have done it, second, because EV publishing companies were only dropping off pamphlets; they weren't buying up billboards, buying up radio slots, buying up T.V. spots, buying up magazine ads, and buying up Internet banner ads.


You're kidding, right? Billy Graham, Pat Robertson, Hank Haanegraf, Dr. James Dobson, Ted Hagard (now moved) just off the top of my head...you're out of the EV loop, Shades.

Jersey Girl

Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2007 12:48 am
by _Polygamy Porter
Hmmm.

Hats off to the Doc for spending the time to write this up.

I think there is a problem. After they click on the Mormon.com ad, they will also have at their disposal the great information whore of the internet, GOOGLE.

On moron.com, err Mormon.com they will get soft pedaled answers, on Google they will get the ugly truth. Couple this with perpetuated stereo types(ala Big Love) and premtive strikes by ministers and I doubt they will get very many hooks set. Perhaps some nibbles, but for the most part they will only reel in clumps of moss and fringe members of society.

Mormonism does not appeal to people who think. Mormonism does not hold the corner of the family values market.

Then there is the whole raping of the term NOW.

Backfire? Perhaps more like a failed start followed by black smoke.

Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2007 12:50 am
by _Dr. Shades
Jersey Girl wrote:You're kidding, right? Billy Graham, Pat Robertson, Hank Haanegraf, Dr. James Dobson, Ted Hagard (now moved) just off the top of my head...you're out of the EV loop, Shades.


I stand corrected. Perhaps your reference to EV publishing firms threw me off.

Either way, it's the first time the Mormons have had such a coordinated, all-out media blitz.