Page 1 of 3
A note to the lurkers from MA&D
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 9:49 pm
by _Mercury
Hey boys and girls, enjoying your anonymous surfing? hi dannyboy, juliann and others. Just wanted to let you know how unprofessional you are and since I do not want anything to do with your third reich-ish antics on MA&D I thought I would post it somewhere we know you frequent.
I got pretty steamed reading the MMM thread so I surfed on over to browse the shadow thread over on MA&D. I for one am appauled at the childishness and petty nature of the believers on that board. To be so callous towards those who only want to let people know of the injustice your so-called religion is heaping upon the families of the massacred is reprehensible. Do you honestly think you will come out on top in this matter?
Completely and utterly disgusted,
Yours Truly
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 10:12 pm
by _Doctor Steuss
Yeah... it's kind of like someone toasting to the murder of someone else.
http://www.mormondiscussions.com/discuss/viewtopic.php?t=2098
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 1:16 am
by _Mercury
Wow, even after I changed my mind. And I thought I respected you.
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:38 am
by _Doctor Steuss
Mercury wrote:Wow, even after I changed my mind. And I thought I respected you.
My bad... I hadn't read the whole thread. Just saw the first 4 or so posts (my humble apologies).
Nonetheless, your respect in me was misplaced from the get-go. I don't even respect me (and my standards are quite low).
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 4:25 am
by _Mercury
Doctor Steuss wrote:
My bad... I hadn't read the whole thread. Just saw the first 4 or so posts (my humble apologies).
Nonetheless, your respect in me was misplaced from the get-go. I don't even respect me (and my standards are quite low).
Apology begrudgingly getting a good looking over.
Do you always source your post subject matter on half read threads and Post Hoc bumblings?
;)
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 4:34 am
by _Doctor Steuss
Mercury wrote:Doctor Steuss wrote:
My bad... I hadn't read the whole thread. Just saw the first 4 or so posts (my humble apologies).
Nonetheless, your respect in me was misplaced from the get-go. I don't even respect me (and my standards are quite low).
Apology begrudgingly getting a good looking over.
Do you always attain your post subject matter on half read threads and Post Hoc bumblings?
;)
No, I usually don't make it that far into the threads. Normally I only read the first word of the subject line and try to fashion the overall nuance from that. It requires some complex alchemy at times to accomplish, and a read through of the horoscope of the poster (and often a letter to Dear Abbey); but overall it usually works.
There was that one time when someone posted a thread titled “Dick Van Dyke Show Goes off the Air”… You can’t imagine the hot water I got myself into by only reading the first line of
that thread. Oi vey.
I wouldn’t look too closely at my apology (even begrudgingly), as I wasn't wearing pants as I typed it, so who knows what may have snuck into it.
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:41 pm
by _Some Schmo
Doctor Steuss wrote: I wouldn’t look too closely at my apology (even begrudgingly), as I wasn't wearing pants as I typed it, so who knows what may have snuck into it.
Bah! Who wears pants anymore anyway?
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 5:35 pm
by _asbestosman
Some Schmo wrote:Bah! Who wears pants anymore anyway?
Women do.
*ducks for cover*
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:08 pm
by _Yoda
asbestosman wrote:Some Schmo wrote:Bah! Who wears pants anymore anyway?
Women do.
*ducks for cover*
No need to duck, you're right! :)
All men in my male harem will now be required to wear kilts. ;)
Bond...you're my first model.
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:11 pm
by _Doctor Steuss
liz3564 wrote:asbestosman wrote:Some Schmo wrote:Bah! Who wears pants anymore anyway?
Women do.
*ducks for cover*
No need to duck, you're right! :)
All men in my male harem will now be required to wear kilts. ;)
Bond...you're my first model.
Bond couldn't figure out why all of the ladies wanted his number directly after the ceremony...
