Darth J wrote:I have a fun idea, Eric.
Eric wrote:I have a funner one. Post a picture of yourself next time you want to post a picture of a woman you find attractive. I'm sure it will add some much needed perspective to this habit of yours.
You bet. Look how well things have worked out for Bob by your knowing his in real life identity.
Why don't you respond to Bob indicating that all these lawsuits you're talking about don't exist in court records, and tell us the name of the court and the case number for each lawsuit, so that we can check these public records about the claims you're making?
Eric wrote:Sure. That sounds like a great idea. You're so upset you aren't even thinking clearly. Darth Nibley, I know this sounds insane to you, but I don't care if you believe me about the lawsuits. Feel free to not believe any of them exist. Bob has said explicitly that he wishes to contact the lawyers and meddle with the cases, and even if he didn't say that, I still wouldn't cross that line. And even if I did cross that line, I don't answer Troll-Bob's questions.
I see. You care only to make assertions about matters that you are making public. You just don't care to support these assertions.
My mission in life is not to have some pervy-poster knowing the first and last names of minor children who have been abused by Mormons at the Gulag. Especially now, after this Miley Cyrus grossness.
Nice try.
That's okay. You can search by the defendant's name, which Bob has done, and found only one such case.
But I hear you about this Miley Cyrus grossness. Girls are icky, huh? And I understand how you don't want to put that in context, because it would be inconsistent with your narrative.
Darth J wrote:You still don't understand that you've proved in this thread that you don't know what you're talking about with Bob's alleged ethical breaches. But at least give us a chance to look at some evidence of something.
Eric wrote:Yes, I proved that by making you have an utter meltdown. Wow. And you believe this stuff?
As I said before, Eric, it is perfectly understandable for you to impute to others the only emotions to which you are able to relate.
Darth J wrote:Or you could explain how someone is being awarded monetary damages in juvenile court. I wasn't quite clear on that, since it makes no sense at all. Did you actually say that?
No, I didn't say that. So, are you not going to justify your verbal flashing anymore? Because that's really what this thread is about now. It's why I'm still here.
Oh, my mistake. I appreciate your still being here, though. I'm not quite sure what "verbal flashing" is supposed to be, but......what was this thread about, again? Oh that's right: you said "Let's start with the facts."
It can be difficult sometimes to understand the difference between a "fact" and a "claim." I think it was my wanting you to explain how I could tell one from the other regarding the things you say that got us here.
Eric, just admit you have no intention of supporting the assertions you made at the start of this thread, and I'll go talk to someone else.