GoForBroke wrote:Ldsfaqs is right. If you continue to use logical conclusions based on facts, and those logical conclusions make the church look bad due to current social values, then yes - it is anti Mormon. A Mormon friendly conclusion should ignore logic and "reasonable person tests" and instead use weasel phrases like "prophet's opinion", "normal for his time" and "the motives for your question are disingenuous".
And another perfect example of how anti-mormons use a little truth to tell great lies.
1. I never at all said what he claims I said.
2. The logical conclusions "based on facts" is not where the problem resides, it's the omission of important facts and the addition of false facts, and the omission of important logic and reason which makes false conclusions that are only "logical" when all the above is done. If facts stood on their own then logical conclusions based on them would always be true. Problem is, most facts don't stand on their own, they require the knowledge of other facts, other logic, etc. for the actual truth to be known.
99% of every anti-mormon claim is false and a lie because it omits important facts and logic, as well as adds false facts and logic, all of which a conclusion is then made from.
I'm a Mormon again for many years now and forever because I studied more on all the issues and claims to know what actually was true. That's when I saw what anti-mormonism does in every single case, which is exactly as I've said.
