Shulem wrote:a trimming of the number of missions to better fit the needs of each region of the world
Time to trim the excess fat. The church bit off more than it could chew and expected more than what the harvest would yield. The church miscalculated. The church screwed up. The church is forced to reduce its expenses and lop of heads.
I'm tickled pink just knowing that the axeman is going to be killing off missions and consolidating its assets in order to keep the ink in the black.
It’s just dawned on me what this explicitly means.
Your photograph comes up on a computer screen, together with key information provided by your bishop and stake president. When your picture appears, we look into your eyes and review your answers to the missionary recommendation questions. For that brief moment, it seems as if you are present and responding to us directly.
As we look at your photograph, we trust that you have cleared in every way the “raised bar” required today to be a faithful, successful missionary. Then, by the power of the Spirit of the Lord and under the direction of President Thomas S. Monson, we assign you to one of the Church’s 406 worldwide missions....
https://www.lds.org/new-era/2015/06/how ... lled?lang=...that doesn’t need you.
If regions of the world are better served by reducing the number of missions and missionaries then they’ve been sending missionaries to regions of the world where they weren’t needed. These young people and their families have spent significant sums of money, have sacrificed, to enable their youth to serve missions. In return the Church sent them to places where they were not needed.
It means the process for assigning missionaries is the opposite of divinely inspired. It means the decision for reducing the age of missionaries and creating a surge, led to under utilised missionaries, poorer mission experiences, wasted money on MTC’s. It’s hard to see how Monson could have made a worse decision.