John, release your finances

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

[_Flaming Meaux]

Meh. This John you speak of probably only has sway to pull $250k because (i) many ex-Mormons can't seem to shake the savior complex they built up while being a Mormon, and (ii) many other ex-Mormons can't seem to shake their need to find some prophet or other individual to do their thinking for them.

Whether its John Dehlin, Sam Young, Kate Kelley, or a host of others yet unnamed, the lyrics change but the music remains the same.

Fortunately ex-Mormons as a group have a bunch of self-appointed saviors to save us from all of the other false saviors that have arisen to profit off the collective need that a seeming majority of the group retains to find a savior, so that's...... good?

[_Red Ryder]

Perhaps his accountant has been busy but doesn’t he have until November 15th assuming it was extended?

2017 shows his compensation as $109,500 so a jump to 250K would be a significant increase.

https://www.citizenaudit.org/2018_05_EO/27-2026793_990_201712.pdf/

[_Rosebud]

Perhaps his accountant has been busy but doesn’t he have until November 15th assuming it was extended?

2017 shows his compensation as $109,500 so a jump to 250K would be a significant increase.

https://www.citizenaudit.org/2018_05_EO/27-2026793_990_201712.pdf/

Yes, a significant increase that coincided with people losing their jobs and leaving.

Late. Release. And be honest, John. Tell the truth this time.

To everybody else, stop making excuses for him. Accountant’s fault my foot.

[_fetchface]

Well, he is going to have to release eventually as required by law. If he extended, then the law gives him more time. Why the public call-out? It will happen when it happens. If it is newsworthy, we can discuss it then.

[_Lemmie]

I am aware that you're personally taking an income of $250,000....

How do you know that?

[_Kishkumen]

Universal Rules:

Do not reveal personal or "in real life" information about any poster on this site that he or she has not explicitly revealed here. This includes avoiding mention of his/her actual first or last name, even if he or she has made it available on some other website.** This also includes information harvested from Facebook.

Terrestrial Forum Rules:

No blatant or otherwise obvious personal attacks allowed. This includes personal attacks against a person's family members.

[_SteelHead]

As much as I hate to post on a Rosebud thread, would that rule apply Kish, to information glean-able off of the financial report of a 501(c)3? I ask because I recall seeing numbers about DCP bandied about in the past that were available from the Interpreter's or some other 501(c)3 financial report.

[_Kishkumen]

As much as I hate to post on a Rosebud thread, would that rule apply Kish, to information glean-able off of the financial report of a 501(c)3? I ask because I recall seeing numbers about DCP bandied about in the past that were available from the Interpreter's or some other 501(c)3 financial report.

I don’t know where this information is coming from, and it sounds like an implied accusation of false reporting or incomplete reporting to me. In any case, I am growing tired of obsessive personal attacks against individuals.

[_SteelHead]

Me too which is why I tend to stay off of DCP or John Dehlin threads.