What a dummy. Why don’t you come right and say the bOoK oF aBrAhAm iS iNsPiReD fIcTiOn? You can’t even utter that because your dummy brain has created some convoluted reality that allows you to stay in pretendlandia. Why have you defied God’s will and not taken a woman through the temple, buddy? You’re old as crap, and have had plenty of time to obey, but you continue to flip God the bird.wenglund wrote: ↑Thu Jan 26, 2023 6:44 amThis is a variation on the Great and Spacious Building party line. It all boils down to: the things of God are foolish to the natural man. If it works for you to pridefully limit the horizons of your understanding to temporal mortality, then so be it. It doesn't at all work for me. To each their own.Marcus wrote: ↑Thu Jan 26, 2023 5:39 amOh brother. I’ll sprain my eyes if I let them roll as much as they want to over this post. Good grief. What educated adult talks like this? Especially about a conman who faked a book, pretending he could read hieroglyphs. What nonsense. But, as you point out, you can’t support the Book of Abraham in any real way, so I suppose invoking the imaginary is the most dramatic hand-waving you can do to draw attention away from the nonsense behind the curtain.
Thanks, -Wade Englund
- Doc