Does the Interpreter Foundation Have Colonialist Ambitions?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
User avatar
Gadianton
God
Posts: 3842
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:56 pm
Location: Elsewhere

Re: Does the Interpreter Foundation Have Colonialist Ambitions?

Post by Gadianton »

Doctor Scratch wrote:
Wed May 31, 2023 12:18 am
Interesting that the plugs for this project have all but disappeared from “SeN.” It will be interesting to see if they turn up again when it comes time to ask for donations.
I wonder if the Brethren have put a stop to the whole thing. If that's the case, we've heard the last about this project.
User avatar
Doctor Scratch
B.H. Roberts Chair of Mopologetic Studies
Posts: 1161
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 7:24 pm
Location: Cassius University

Re: Does the Interpreter Foundation Have Colonialist Ambitions?

Post by Doctor Scratch »

Gadianton wrote:
Wed May 31, 2023 12:25 am
Doctor Scratch wrote:
Wed May 31, 2023 12:18 am
Interesting that the plugs for this project have all but disappeared from “SeN.” It will be interesting to see if they turn up again when it comes time to ask for donations.
I wonder if the Brethren have put a stop to the whole thing. If that's the case, we've heard the last about this project.
An excellent point.
"If, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
drumdude
God
Posts: 5212
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Re: Does the Interpreter Foundation Have Colonialist Ambitions?

Post by drumdude »

You will perhaps recall the two blog entries — “Hearts of Darkness” and “Seeking ‘wealth’ in the DR Congo” — from a while back in which I related how a small troop of the Church’s more zany and unhinged critics were accusing the Interpreter Foundation of “colonialist” ambitions in the DR Congo. The accusations came because one of the Foundation’s vice presidents (Jeff Bradshaw) and two of our filmmaker friends (James Jordan and Russ Richins) had headed there to gather footage for a series of short films on the origins and rise of the Church in the Congo and on the stories of some of those involved in its emergence.


Jeff Bradshaw, by the way, currently serves as a service missionary for the Church History Department. He has been asked to write histories of the temples in Kinshasa, Lubumbashi, and Kananga — the first of which has already been dedicated — and, in line with that assignment, he and the Interpreter Foundation are working with RedBrick Filmworks to document the history of the Church in the DR Congo on film
One wonders why the Church in the Congo (which is by all DCP’s photographic accounts very thriving) needs outside help to tell its own story.

Would the Saints in England not be allowed to tell their own story either? Does the Vatican make trips to America to tell the story of Catholicism’s spread throughout the states?

It seems like the unspoken implication here is that only some white dudes from Utah are capable of getting this very important and not self-serving story out.

I can understand telling the story of the temples being built, as they were commissioned by Utah. But it seems Interpreter has gone whole hog into a completely new story. Even after, as it was reported here, the brethren seemed to have asked that they stop.
User avatar
Doctor Scratch
B.H. Roberts Chair of Mopologetic Studies
Posts: 1161
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 7:24 pm
Location: Cassius University

Re: Does the Interpreter Foundation Have Colonialist Ambitions?

Post by Doctor Scratch »

You forgot to mention that Dr. Peterson included an image in his blog post, with the following caption:
After interviews in Boma, Jeffrey Mark Bradshaw, at the top, poses with missionaries from the Democratic Republic of the Congo Kinshasa Mission (including the mission president and his wife) in front of an ancient baobab tree that is historically associated with the famous European explorer of Africa Sir Henry Morton Stanley (1841-1904), who may or may not actually have spoken the famous line “Dr. Livingstone, I presume?”
The image features Bradshaw posed at the top of a pyramid—he the lone white guy atop a human pyramid of Black folks. DCP seems fixated on the Stanley/Livingston story, and I guess it’s fitting that he would include this image, since Stanley was a principal figure in the colonialist exploitation of the Congo. Either DCP and Bradshaw are completely tone-deaf (more likely), or they think this sort of thing is “funny.”
"If, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
drumdude
God
Posts: 5212
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Re: Does the Interpreter Foundation Have Colonialist Ambitions?

Post by drumdude »

Oof.
IMG_3211.jpeg
IMG_3211.jpeg (68.71 KiB) Viewed 253 times


Surely a preview of the hierarchy in Joseph Smith's invented heaven.
drumdude
God
Posts: 5212
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Re: Does the Interpreter Foundation Have Colonialist Ambitions?

Post by drumdude »

https://notbybreadalonefilm.com/

IS THE CHURCH HISTORY DEPARTMENT INVOLVED?


Yes, we are striving for strict historical accuracy of the events portrayed in the film and simply could not succeed without the cooperation of the Church History department. A signed memo of understanding provides guidance on roles, relationships, and intellectual property issues. Interpreter is recognized by the Church as an “independent advocate” and has previously provided limited financial support for Interpreter’s mission. However, the Church provides no explicit or implied endorsement of Interpreter projects.
Marcus
God
Posts: 5033
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: Does the Interpreter Foundation Have Colonialist Ambitions?

Post by Marcus »

This recent quote from DCP seems to fit here. From an article titled
"Are Latter-day Saint Temples too Lavish?"
By Daniel C. Peterson · August 2, 2023
DCP wrote:...An increasing proportion of Latter-day Saints live in what has sometimes been called the “Third World.” For many of them, I expect, the temples of the Church may well be the most beautiful buildings they are ever permitted to enter...As a pampered and privileged resident of perhaps the wealthiest nation in human history, I’m happy if my tithes can help in even a small way to provide that experience for them...
https://latterdaysaintmag.com/are-latte ... oo-lavish/
"Pampered and privileged," no argument there, but "permitted to enter"???????
User avatar
malkie
God
Posts: 1478
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:41 pm

Re: Does the Interpreter Foundation Have Colonialist Ambitions?

Post by malkie »

drumdude wrote:
Sat Aug 05, 2023 6:07 am
https://notbybreadalonefilm.com/

IS THE CHURCH HISTORY DEPARTMENT INVOLVED?


Yes, we are striving for strict historical accuracy of the events portrayed in the film and simply could not succeed without the cooperation of the Church History department. A signed memo of understanding provides guidance on roles, relationships, and intellectual property issues. Interpreter is recognized by the Church as an “independent advocate” and has previously provided limited financial support for Interpreter’s mission. However, the Church provides no explicit or implied endorsement of Interpreter projects.
Before Dr Shades jumps in, let me point out that the bolded clause has the previously-mentioned instance of "Interpreter" as its subject. Cutting out the first clause with "Interpreter" as its subject ("is recognized by the Church as an “independent advocate” ") leaves us with:

' Interpreter has previously provided limited financial support for Interpreter’s mission.'

Picky, picky - right?
drumdude
God
Posts: 5212
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Re: Does the Interpreter Foundation Have Colonialist Ambitions?

Post by drumdude »

malkie wrote:
Sat Aug 05, 2023 12:49 pm
drumdude wrote:
Sat Aug 05, 2023 6:07 am
https://notbybreadalonefilm.com/


Before Dr Shades jumps in, let me point out that the bolded clause has the previously-mentioned instance of "Interpreter" as its subject. Cutting out the first clause with "Interpreter" as its subject ("is recognized by the Church as an “independent advocate” ") leaves us with:

' Interpreter has previously provided limited financial support for Interpreter’s mission.'

Picky, picky - right?
It’s not well written. But the “however” in the next sentence implies the subject of the previous sentence is the church.
Post Reply