CWK #32: Anti-Mormonism

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
User avatar
Kishkumen
God
Posts: 8868
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:37 pm
Location: Cassius University
Contact:

CWK #32: Anti-Mormonism

Post by Kishkumen »

Drops 10 pm MT.
A very old American tradition is Anti-Mormonism, the promulgation of a portrait of Mormonism that seeks to stoke hatred and fear regarding Mormonism and sometimes Mormons themselves. Anti-Mormonism is as old as Mormonism, as some of the earliest converts to Mormonism left and fought the new movement. In this episode I discuss my experience with anti-Mormonism and my views about the problem of ministries that attack other religions.
https://youtu.be/E5Z9OtTJzVo

Obviously prompted by our recent arguments. Here I get into more detail on the topic of why anti-Mormonism and other so-called anti-cult ministries bother me.
Markk
God
Posts: 1525
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2022 1:49 am

Re: CWK #32: Anti-Mormonism

Post by Markk »

Is this another rant???? You should change the beverage in the title of your podcast to "whine with Kish"....it is far more appropriate.
User avatar
Kishkumen
God
Posts: 8868
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:37 pm
Location: Cassius University
Contact:

Re: CWK #32: Anti-Mormonism

Post by Kishkumen »

Markk wrote:
Wed Oct 30, 2024 2:42 am
Is this another rant???? You should change the beverage in the title of your podcast to "whine with Kish"....it is far more appropriate.
If you don’t like them, don’t watch them.
Markk
God
Posts: 1525
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2022 1:49 am

Re: CWK #32: Anti-Mormonism

Post by Markk »

Kishkumen wrote:
Wed Oct 30, 2024 2:56 am
Markk wrote:
Wed Oct 30, 2024 2:42 am
Is this another rant???? You should change the beverage in the title of your podcast to "whine with Kish"....it is far more appropriate.
If you don’t like them, don’t watch them.
Actually I normally would not, but when you take what we write about here and rant about it I am not sure if I can resist, it is like driving by accident on the freeway, you sit in traffic or an hour and it is almost impossible to look when you finally pass it. by the way I have only watched parts of two, your first one and the last one where you whined about me. It should be rather funny.
User avatar
Kishkumen
God
Posts: 8868
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:37 pm
Location: Cassius University
Contact:

Re: CWK #32: Anti-Mormonism

Post by Kishkumen »

Markk wrote:
Wed Oct 30, 2024 3:15 am
Actually I normally would not, but when you take what we write about here and rant about it I am not sure if I can resist, it is like driving by accident on the freeway, you sit in traffic or an hour and it is almost impossible to look when you finally pass it. by the way I have only watched parts of two, your first one and the last one where you whined about me. It should be rather funny.
Fair enough. It is not like I don’t want you to watch them. At the same time, I don’t want to spend hours answering harangues about the perceived failures in my casual chats.
Markk
God
Posts: 1525
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2022 1:49 am

Re: CWK #32: Anti-Mormonism

Post by Markk »

Kishkumen wrote:
Wed Oct 30, 2024 3:20 am
Markk wrote:
Wed Oct 30, 2024 3:15 am
Actually I normally would not, but when you take what we write about here and rant about it I am not sure if I can resist, it is like driving by accident on the freeway, you sit in traffic or an hour and it is almost impossible to look when you finally pass it. by the way I have only watched parts of two, your first one and the last one where you whined about me. It should be rather funny.
Fair enough. It is not like I don’t want you to watch them. At the same time, I don’t want to spend hours answering harangues about the perceived failures in my casual chats.
LOL chats???....you get called out here and you produce a podcast to vent? LOL, sure, casual chats? by the way a chat is between at least to people....your podcasts, at least the two I watched parts of, are you alone. But I could be wrong here maybe you are chatting to yourself, which might make sense.

Kish, honestly, I have been open and honest in conversation with you, and I am honestly trying to understand your ideology, but it is like pulling teeth to get a straight answer from you....you just play the victim and call peoples names that disagree with you or press you for an answer, an dnow call them out in your casual chats. .

Why on earth can't you state whether you believe Joseph Smith is a true prophet or not....is beyond me.
User avatar
Kishkumen
God
Posts: 8868
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:37 pm
Location: Cassius University
Contact:

Re: CWK #32: Anti-Mormonism

Post by Kishkumen »

Markk wrote:
Wed Oct 30, 2024 3:39 am
LOL chats???....you get called out here and you produce a podcast to vent? LOL, sure, casual chats? by the way a chat is between at least to people....your podcasts, at least the two I watched parts of, are you alone. But I could be wrong here maybe you are chatting to yourself, which might make sense.

Kish, honestly, I have been open and honest in conversation with you, and I am honestly trying to understand your ideology, but it is like pulling teeth to get a straight answer from you....you just play the victim and call peoples names that disagree with you or press you for an answer, an dnow call them out in your casual chats. .

Why on earth can't you state whether you believe Joseph Smith is a true prophet or not....is beyond me.
No, Markk. I interact with people here and various thoughts percolate. I go make a video while those thoughts percolate. The videos are aimed at casual viewers who might be interested in a different, more neutral take on Mormonism. I say “chat” because the premise is that this is the other side of a casual conversation at a café. Hence the title of the channel. OK?

Why do you think I owe you some explanation of my ideology or personal views? Why is that important to you? Why should your demand be important to me? What will it change here?

This YouTube channel takes a neutral position on purpose. You come at me over the channel as though I needed to make it to your specifications. I really don’t. And given the nature of the channel, your questions about my personal beliefs have no bearing on it.
Markk
God
Posts: 1525
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2022 1:49 am

Re: CWK #32: Anti-Mormonism

Post by Markk »

Kishkumen wrote:
Wed Oct 30, 2024 3:50 am
Markk wrote:
Wed Oct 30, 2024 3:39 am
LOL chats???....you get called out here and you produce a podcast to vent? LOL, sure, casual chats? by the way a chat is between at least to people....your podcasts, at least the two I watched parts of, are you alone. But I could be wrong here maybe you are chatting to yourself, which might make sense.

Kish, honestly, I have been open and honest in conversation with you, and I am honestly trying to understand your ideology, but it is like pulling teeth to get a straight answer from you....you just play the victim and call peoples names that disagree with you or press you for an answer, an dnow call them out in your casual chats. .

Why on earth can't you state whether you believe Joseph Smith is a true prophet or not....is beyond me.
No, Markk. I interact with people here and various thoughts percolate. I go make a video while those thoughts percolate. The videos are aimed at casual viewers who might be interested in a different, more neutral take on Mormonism. I say “chat” because the premise is that this is the other side of a casual conversation at a café. Hence the title of the channel. OK?

Why do you think I owe you some explanation of my ideology or personal views? Why is that important to you? Why should your demand be important to me? What will it change here?

This YouTube channel takes a neutral position on purpose. You come at me over the channel as though I needed to make it to your specifications. I really don’t. And given the nature of the channel, your questions about my personal beliefs have no bearing on it.
I disagree. You want to champion your opinions, and pretend you somehow know more about this crap that others, and the back down and deflect when asked to support your assertions. It is really that simple. You even admitted that your last podcast was a rant...as I predict this one will be. You owe me some answers, for one, because you promised me you would answer some of my questions, which you have so far failed to do. And beyond that, while you don't owe answers to me, it would help you with credibility if you did.
User avatar
Kishkumen
God
Posts: 8868
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:37 pm
Location: Cassius University
Contact:

Re: CWK #32: Anti-Mormonism

Post by Kishkumen »

I disagree. You want to champion your opinions, and pretend you somehow know more about this crap that others, and the back down and deflect when asked to support your assertions. It is really that simple. You even admitted that your last podcast was a rant...as I predict this one will be. You owe me some answers, for one, because you promised me you would answer some of my questions, which you have so far failed to do. And beyond that, while you don't owe answers to me, it would help you with credibility if you did.
Who has time to answer questions when I have to field all of this baffling and bizarre hostility? I never promised to answer all of your questions. If we can ever bring this around to a civil discussion, I will answer some of your questions, but, the thing is, I don’t put much stock in religious beliefs, as I have said many times here. As soon as I hear “we believe X,” my eyes glaze over.
User avatar
Rivendale
God
Posts: 1429
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:21 pm

Re: CWK #32: Anti-Mormonism

Post by Rivendale »

So far Kish you apparently have limited information about the current view of Mormonism. You are living in Chick track , god makers world view. We all know of all this. Pick up the speed. Richard Packham penetrated Mormonism years ago using much more varied descriptive terms. And yes you are coffee with Kish but man whatever audience you are targeting I am at a loss. Rfm would kick you to the curb. Typing as I listen. Big tent religion will never work. Get rid of your dumb Satanic crap.
Post Reply