I Have Questions wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2024 4:05 pm
One of the highpoints for the day was visiting the Veracruz México Temple. In outward appearance, it’s very similar if not identical to several of the other small temples that were built in México and elsewhere during the rapid flurry of temple construction that was undertaken during Gordon B. Hinckley’s tenure as president of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. However, I very much liked its unusually visible location in an attractive, upscale area of the city, and its grounds were beautiful and exceptionally well maintained. It’s a nice advertisement, as it were, for the Restoration and the Church.
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... osmos.html
Upscale. Is that really how Jesus would want to be perceived? Upmarket, exclusive, expensive? My view is that Jesus would want the focus point of His Church to be amongst the poor and the needy, the downtrodden etc. rather than mingling amongst the high property value areas where the impoverished daren't venture. Bragging about being upmarket seems to me to be contrary to the idea and example of Jesus.
When my little branch in Scotland was organized, they met in rented premises in the downtown area - reasonably accessible to most people by bus or on foot. Only 1 or 2 members had cars.
When the church bought land to build, it was in a "posh" part of town, several km from downtown, in an area where no members lived.
Now, instead of taking one bus or having a short walk to church, members had to take 2 or 3 buses (there were no "transfers - each busfare had to be paid), or a long walk. Actually, there wasn't even a bus route that ran past the building. And being in the west coast of the country, as often as not it was raining.
We built it, but they never came
As far as I know, the branch
never had members who lived in that neighbourhood. Missionary work was hard, with many missionaries going home without a single baptism to the credit. The few 'tisms that there were usually came from the poorer parts of town - the relatively wealthy people who lived near the building had no interest in joining "the Mormons".
It was a burden on the members, few as they were, to maintain the building. Living so far away made for an additional burden that was, at least in my mind, completely unnecessary.
Local faked attendance figures + SLC planning = serious inconvenience.