VERY sage observation bird... you hit the worm right on the beak...Moksha wrote: ↑Sun Feb 14, 2021 2:44 amApologists can never break even with Gemli in an argument unless they approach him with complete honesty. That means never begging the question by claiming your assumptions are true. State what you believe and how that benefits you. The more pretense you bring to your arguments, the more you lose to Gemli. Hope that helps.gemli Danite Operative • a day ago
Danite Operative said:
"gemli logic:
-There is no evidence for God
-I do not know what I would even accept as evidence for God"
Gemli Reply:
What would you accept as evidence of faeries in your garden? Or gnomes? or Leprechauns?
Still gemli's gems: still the best reason to read a blog
-
- God
- Posts: 5057
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 1:18 am
Re: Still gemli's gems: still the best reason to read a blog
Re: Still gemli's gems: still the best reason to read a blog
Philo Sofee wrote: ↑Sun Feb 14, 2021 3:49 amVERY sage observation bird... you hit the worm right on the beak...
Grabbing that scarab, in the lower right corner, with logic would have Gemli's full approval.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
-
- God
- Posts: 5057
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 1:18 am
Re: Still gemli's gems: still the best reason to read a blog
Now THAT........that right there is some wickedly accurate Egyptology..... the ancient artist must have been drunk to draw such a stupid looking scarab.....idiot he was....Moksha wrote: ↑Sun Feb 14, 2021 4:13 amPhilo Sofee wrote: ↑Sun Feb 14, 2021 3:49 amVERY sage observation bird... you hit the worm right on the beak...
Grabbing that scarab, in the lower right corner, with logic would have Gemli's full approval.
Re: Still gemli's gems: still the best reason to read a blog
Midgley has made in effort in that regard:Moksha wrote: ↑Sun Feb 14, 2021 2:44 amApologists can never break even with Gemli in an argument unless they approach him with complete honesty. That means never begging the question by claiming your assumptions are true. State what you believe and how that benefits you. The more pretense you bring to your arguments, the more you lose to Gemli. Hope that helps.gemli Danite Operative • a day ago
Danite Operative said:
"gemli logic:
-There is no evidence for God
-I do not know what I would even accept as evidence for God"
Gemli Reply:
What would you accept as evidence of faeries in your garden? Or gnomes? or Leprechauns?
Lou learned well.The Midge wrote: ....But the fact is that a vice like hatred is also learned....
Re: Still gemli's gems: still the best reason to read a blog
As Dr. Midgley would point out from his latest cognitive test, "Person, Gemli, Dan, Camera, Gemli".
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace