Page 5 of 5
Re: Still gemli's gems: still the best reason to read a blog
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2021 3:49 am
by Philo Sofee
Moksha wrote: ↑Sun Feb 14, 2021 2:44 am
gemli Danite Operative • a day ago
Danite Operative said:
"gemli logic:
-There is no evidence for God
-I do not know what I would even accept as evidence for God"
Gemli Reply:
What would you accept as evidence of faeries in your garden? Or gnomes? or Leprechauns?
Apologists can never break even with Gemli in an argument unless they approach him with complete honesty. That means never begging the question by claiming your assumptions are true. State what you believe and how that benefits you. The more pretense you bring to your arguments, the more you lose to Gemli. Hope that helps.
VERY sage observation bird... you hit the worm right on the beak...
Re: Still gemli's gems: still the best reason to read a blog
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2021 4:13 am
by Moksha
Philo Sofee wrote: ↑Sun Feb 14, 2021 3:49 am
VERY sage observation bird... you hit the worm right on the beak...
Grabbing that scarab, in the lower right corner, with logic would have Gemli's full approval.
Re: Still gemli's gems: still the best reason to read a blog
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2021 4:17 am
by Philo Sofee
Moksha wrote: ↑Sun Feb 14, 2021 4:13 am
Philo Sofee wrote: ↑Sun Feb 14, 2021 3:49 am
VERY sage observation bird... you hit the worm right on the beak...
Grabbing that scarab, in the lower right corner, with logic would have Gemli's full approval.
Now THAT........that right there is some wickedly accurate Egyptology..... the ancient artist must have been drunk to draw such a stupid looking scarab.....idiot he was....
Re: Still gemli's gems: still the best reason to read a blog
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2021 6:38 pm
by Lem
Moksha wrote: ↑Sun Feb 14, 2021 2:44 am
gemli Danite Operative • a day ago
Danite Operative said:
"gemli logic:
-There is no evidence for God
-I do not know what I would even accept as evidence for God"
Gemli Reply:
What would you accept as evidence of faeries in your garden? Or gnomes? or Leprechauns?
Apologists can never break even with Gemli in an argument unless they approach him with complete honesty. That means never begging the question by claiming your assumptions are true. State what you believe and how that benefits you. The more pretense you bring to your arguments, the more you lose to Gemli. Hope that helps.
Midgley has made in effort in that regard:
The Midge wrote:
....But the fact is that a vice like hatred is also learned....
Lou learned well.
Re: Still gemli's gems: still the best reason to read a blog
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2021 3:45 pm
by Moksha
As Dr. Midgley would point out from his latest cognitive test, "Person, Gemli, Dan, Camera, Gemli".