One View Of The Problem

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
Post Reply
_Coggins7
_Emeritus
Posts: 3679
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:25 am

One View Of The Problem

Post by _Coggins7 »

The Orange Grove: Welfare state and illegal immigration
Redistributing people's wealth to others, citizen or migrant, is the true wrong.


By TIBOR R. MACHAN


Paul McGuire, talk-show host and author of the novel "The Warning," claims that illegal immigrants impose a $2.2 trillion burden on U.S. taxpayers and that it is "immoral to make American taxpayers shoulder this burden." He made his remarks May 22 on Neil Cavuto's Fox News Channel program and as with nearly all those utterances, there was no real examination of the facts cited and the implications drawn from them.

Still, it bears noting that the immorality begins not with putting illegal immigrants on the welfare rolls or providing them social services at the expense of American citizens. The immorality lies in the welfare state itself, in the government's policy of coercive wealth redistribution. In fact, if there were any moral justification to such wealth redistribution, having the wealth go to illegal immigrants could be considered far more morally defensible than having it go to American citizens or legal immigrants.

After all, the argument for coercive wealth redistribution is that those in real dire straits cannot be expected to make it in life so they deserve to be provided for by people more well off.

Nearly all the books defending the welfare state advance arguments along such lines – the desperate needs of others make it right to take a sizable amount of people's wealth and hand it to the needy.

But if this is so, which it certainly isn't, who but the illegal immigrant is more qualified? Many of them are nearly destitute. Moreover, such people have shown some merit in having done something about their dire straits, namely, escaped from a terrible country where virtually no opportunity for advancement exists. So, such people, the reasoning of welfare statists should go, have a greater claim on the taxes collected from Americans than other Americans who aren't that badly off, by global standards. It is just those illegal immigrants who can make the most use of "free" health care, education, welfare and such, given how badly off many of them are.

Of course, there is a great deal wrong with this line of reasoning but not because it involves illegal immigrants. The problem lies with coercive wealth redistribution. Yet Mr. McGuire didn't say anything against that – although perhaps because he didn't have a chance.

I want to say how immoral it is to rob reasonably (or even very) well-off Peter in order to benefit destitute Paul. Such a transfer is not generosity, of course, because generosity must be voluntary, not coercive. All that the welfare state exhibits is how much bullying people will tolerate before they finally have had enough. And yes, sadly, too many people in America as well as elsewhere are entirely too compliant where coercive wealth redistribution and other kinds of governmental intrusiveness are concerned. They are intimidated by those who claim that it's greedy or mean for people to retain what is theirs, which is bunk.

Those, however, who approve of coercive wealth redistribution have absolutely no case against illegal immigrants obtaining some of the loot that has been confiscated from American citizens and legal residents. They have no case because illegal immigrants are in general far more in need of what the welfare state hands out than are American citizens or even legal immigrants.

There is a principle in logic that holds, when one allows a contradiction into a line of argumentation, nothing can make sense any longer. And this applies to political economy as well. Once the welfare state's principle of coercive wealth redistribution has become standard public policy, there is no hope of any kind of rational, intelligent solution to the problems that arise.

This is what is evident in the current debate about illegal immigration: The welfare state is the underlying fundamental problem. Until that system is abolished, until a revolutionary change occurs and no Peter is looted for the sake of any Paul – whether poor, rich, legal or illegal – there will be no solution to the illegal immigration problem.

Mod Note: Moved to Off-Topic Folder-Bond
Post Reply