Yes, I know this doesn't belong here. I wanted Shades to see it and have a chance to explain/describe what he thinks happened where others can see it so folks understand what happened, too. Is this something the system did? If so, how and why did it? Is this mod action? If so, why?
http://mormondiscussions.com/discuss/viewtopic.php?t=6406&sid=b3d0cf87eb68dc275183368aad74c1c4
Just for clarity, I posted two photos of the same person in a bikini. Both images came from google.com. One photo was X'd out while the other wasn't.
Thanks!
Shades, can you explain what happened to this thread?
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 34407
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am
Shades, can you explain what happened to this thread?
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Chinese Proverb
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 34407
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 34407
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 14117
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm
Moniker is somewhat right, but it's a little more pervasive than a site merely disallowing you from image leeching.
To whit, anytime you create a link to a photo that's no longer there, Windows will automatically replace the image with a miniature red "X" on a white background.
For example, let's say I create the following link:
[ img ]http://www.thissitedoesnotexist.com/thisimagedoesnotexist.jpg[ img ]
Guess what shows up?
You linking a picture from Google was half the problem. It often caches images for its index, which remain in place even after the image on the host site is long gone for whatever reason.
So expect lots of red "x"s when you link an image from Google. No need to blame anyone on this site.
To whit, anytime you create a link to a photo that's no longer there, Windows will automatically replace the image with a miniature red "X" on a white background.
For example, let's say I create the following link:
[ img ]http://www.thissitedoesnotexist.com/thisimagedoesnotexist.jpg[ img ]
Guess what shows up?

You linking a picture from Google was half the problem. It often caches images for its index, which remain in place even after the image on the host site is long gone for whatever reason.
So expect lots of red "x"s when you link an image from Google. No need to blame anyone on this site.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
--Louis Midgley
--Louis Midgley