subgenius wrote:says one of the standard bearers of link-run.
Who never criticizes people for commenting their views without having one of my own.
subgenius wrote:Yeah, guys like you have never presumed anything on this matter.
Then point to an example.
subgenius wrote:Yeah, how anyone could think you believed Mueller was gonna get Trump is craaazy… how silly of me. And yeah, no new indictments is just so ambiguous, so unclear, so hazy...it could mean anything.
Still waiting. I don't think its silly, just telling. The Right Wing media has been trouncing on a straw man for days now, especially with their hysterical demand for "punishment" for anyone on the Left including the resignation of Adam Schiff for saying things he never said. It helps to actually pay attention to what the Left says instead of just trusting Sean Hannity to tell you what the Left is saying. Even on this forum where you frequent, Liberals have been saying the SDNY and other investigations are going to be the ones that really matter. I've said several times that nailing Trump for conspiracy or even obstruction is going to be nearly impossible. The only reason we nailed Nixon was just the luck of having incriminating audio tapes of him.
subgenius wrote:you mock me for "literally just admitted having no knowledge of its contents" - and point out "Barr"....then you state - "based on a document that quite literally says it doesn't"..a document you have not read, but you claim to know what it "Literally" says.....yeah, you got all kinds of credibility and loads of that smartsy smartsy stuff.
The document is the 4 page Barr synopsis which we have read, and says the report does not exonerate Trump. But things like reality and facts don't matter to Trumpers.
