GOP Embraced this "Doctor."

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
User avatar
Res Ipsa
God
Posts: 10636
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:44 pm
Location: Playing Rabbits

Re: GOP Embraced this "Doctor."

Post by Res Ipsa »

Gadianton wrote:
Wed Feb 16, 2022 8:32 pm
Res wrote:Kevin, there is a flavor of Sanders supporter that Binger fits neatly into
I disagree. I agree that Sanders is a "populist" and there have been left-oriented "occupy" movements, but the actual issues do matter. Bernie has been nothing but pro vaccine and mask, while Binger has been strictly anti-vaccine and mask. Has Bernie been joining hands with Rand Paul praising the truckers? If so then you could say there is some overlap, although that issue takes a backseat to the pandemic.

All the populist positions Binger has supported have been right-wing populist positions. If the hand that moves the puppet really is a Bernie supporter, then the puppet is revealed as nothing but a troll, and the hand is a terrible friend for expecting his in real life friend to give privileges to a puppet that is just trolling and not even sincere about the positions rule breaking.
The overlap is the anti-establishment stance, and that's more important to some people than it is to you and me. Bernie ran as a candidate of the Democratic Party against the establishment, corporate Democratic Party. If sticking it to the man is your jam, then that's a pretty attractive bandwagon to jump on. If you're a "burn it all down" type like a Steve Bannon, then the most important thing is burning it all down. In that way, some folks on the extreme left are virtually indistinguishable from some folks on the extreme right. "Burn it all down" is more important today than what get's built as a replacement down the road.

Take Tulsi Gabbard. She's part of the Progressive wing of the Democratic Party. She's pro universal health insurance. She's pro choice. She's pro universal basic income. She's pro family and medical leave. She's anti-military intervention. She supports reducing the President's power to take military action without the consent of Congress. She was Vice Chair of the DNC until she resigned in 2016 to endorse Sanders. In this last Presidential campaign, Sanders defended her against spurious claims that she was some kind of Russian stooge. The Nation, a leading Progressive publication in the U.S., defended her skepticism toward claims that the Syrian president used chemical weapons against dissidents. (She does not have a progressive track record on LGBT rights.)

She's also anti-establishment. She attacked the Democratic Party for structuring the nomination process to favor Clinton. She quit a DNC leadership position to back Sanders.

The most significant difference between the anti-establishment left and the anti-establishment right today is that the latter caused the Republican establishment to knuckle under. The Democratic didn't. So, most of the anti-establishment visibility is on the right, where it's become mainstreamed. (The problem, of course, is when the anti-establishment folks become the new establishment, and they become anti-themselves).

I don't endorse anti-establishmentism as a political philosophy. But Binger voting for Sanders and Gabbard is perfectly understandable to me.
he/him
we all just have to live through it,
holding each other’s hands.


— Alison Luterman
User avatar
Res Ipsa
God
Posts: 10636
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:44 pm
Location: Playing Rabbits

Re: GOP Embraced this "Doctor."

Post by Res Ipsa »

K Graham wrote:
Wed Feb 16, 2022 8:50 pm
Incidentally, Tusi Gabbard is also a Neo-Con type Hawk on when it comes to terrorism. If she were President she'd be sending troops everywhere she felt there was an Islamist threat.

Tulsi Gabbard Is Not Your Friend

Tulsi Gabbard is hailed as a progressive champion. But her views on Islam and support for far-right leaders suggest otherwise.
I don't hail her as a Champion, but she's absolutely within the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. There is a portion of the Progressive wing that is aggressively anti-terrorist and anti-Islam. She does not fit the definition of a NeoCon at all.
he/him
we all just have to live through it,
holding each other’s hands.


— Alison Luterman
Binger
God
Posts: 6500
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2021 12:34 am
Location: That's the difference. I actually have a Blue Heeler

Re: GOP Embraced this "Doctor."

Post by Binger »

Res Ipsa wrote:
Wed Feb 16, 2022 9:45 pm
K Graham wrote:
Wed Feb 16, 2022 8:50 pm
Incidentally, Tusi Gabbard is also a Neo-Con type Hawk on when it comes to terrorism. If she were President she'd be sending troops everywhere she felt there was an Islamist threat.

Tulsi Gabbard Is Not Your Friend

Tulsi Gabbard is hailed as a progressive champion. But her views on Islam and support for far-right leaders suggest otherwise.
I don't hail her as a Champion, but she's absolutely within the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. There is a portion of the Progressive wing that is aggressively anti-terrorist and anti-Islam. She does not fit the definition of a NeoCon at all.
I hope Tulsi runs for President again. She has been the best option I have seen in a long time.
User avatar
Res Ipsa
God
Posts: 10636
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:44 pm
Location: Playing Rabbits

Re: GOP Embraced this "Doctor."

Post by Res Ipsa »

Binger wrote:
Wed Feb 16, 2022 10:57 pm
Res Ipsa wrote:
Wed Feb 16, 2022 9:45 pm


I don't hail her as a Champion, but she's absolutely within the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. There is a portion of the Progressive wing that is aggressively anti-terrorist and anti-Islam. She does not fit the definition of a NeoCon at all.
I hope Tulsi runs for the President again. She has been the best option I have seen in a long time.
Why do you consider her the best option? Which of her positions on issues do you agree or disagree with?
he/him
we all just have to live through it,
holding each other’s hands.


— Alison Luterman
Binger
God
Posts: 6500
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2021 12:34 am
Location: That's the difference. I actually have a Blue Heeler

Re: GOP Embraced this "Doctor."

Post by Binger »

Res Ipsa wrote:
Wed Feb 16, 2022 11:24 pm
Binger wrote:
Wed Feb 16, 2022 10:57 pm


I hope Tulsi runs for the President again. She has been the best option I have seen in a long time.
Why do you consider her the best option? Which of her positions on issues do you agree or disagree with?
Agree:
Not a neocon
No meddling in dictator battles all over the world.
Pro Weed, or, anti anti weed. Whatever you call it. (I damned hate weed, by the way.)
Pro choice
Anti private prison
Free ASSANGE and Snowden. Not sure on Snowden, but definitely agreed on Assange!

Disagree:
Kooky ass gun stuff
sorta disagree on immigration

Mostly:
I think she is a hell of a lot smarter and has a hell of lot more common sense than any of those other ding dongs that spent too much time in the Senate.
Post Reply