Will Liberals/Progressives Listen to Zuby or Coleman?

[Binger]

https://youtu.be/LK9CNdV3MNo

It is 1:02 long.

Here is a chance for you to listen to two black dudes.
Zuby and Adam B. Coleman.

[Res Ipsa]

Sure, just as soon as soon as conservatives listen to each and every black democrat.

[Binger]

Sure, just as soon as soon as conservatives listen to each and every black democrat.

Bingo

[Dr. Shades]

https://youtu.be/LK9CNdV3MNo

It is 1:02 long.

TO THE READER: What he means is that it's an hour and two minutes long, not that it's a minute and two seconds long.

Here is a chance for you to listen to two black dudes.
Zuby and Adam B. Coleman.

For those of us who don't want to spend an entire hour, what's the gist of what they say?

[Res Ipsa]

Sure, just as soon as soon as conservatives listen to each and every black democrat.

Bingo

ogniB

[Binger]

https://youtu.be/LK9CNdV3MNo

It is 1:02 long.

TO THE READER: What he means is that it's an hour and two minutes long, not that it's a minute and two seconds long.

Here is a chance for you to listen to two black dudes.
Zuby and Adam B. Coleman.

For those of us who don't want to spend an entire hour, what's the gist of what they say?

Adam B. Coleman is the guest on Zuby's podcast.

Adam describes is life, his experience growing up without the presence of his father or other men. He talks about being a father and what that means to him. He describes his transition away from the prescribed victimization for Black people. He talks about labels, including "African American." He and Zuby discuss conservative principles in Black communities, including Africa.

It is a typical long-form podcast.

The point is made though, right? We will take the time to listen when it pleases or affirms what we know or believe. If it doesn't, please just give it to us in 180 characters or less and so we can tell you how wrong you are.

[Chap]

We will take the time to listen when it pleases or affirms what we know or believe. If it doesn't, please just give it to us in 180 characters or less and so we can tell you how wrong you are.

Nope. Like many others on this board, present and past, I can absorb the content of a printed article much more quickly and efficient than a long rambling podcast. I can also see quickly whether an article is likely to be worth reading in full or not. A podcast? Not really.

I don't have time to waste on a hour-long listening session just because you say it is interesting.

[Dr. Shades]

The point is made though, right? We will take the time to listen when it pleases or affirms what we know or believe. If it doesn't, please just give it to us in 180 characters or less and so we can tell you how wrong you are.

No. We have no idea if it pleases us or affirms what we know or believe—or the opposite of that—if we don’t have a full extra hour to spend watching it.