Why do boldly and frequently repeated lies, backed by no evidence whatsoever, often seem more persuasive to more people than hard truths supported by incontrovertible evidence?
Because it’s the easier path, for both the liar and the lied-to.
Disheartening, isn't it? Given that reality, it seems miraculous that any real democracies ever arose at all.
No precept or claim is more suspect or more likely to be false than one that can only be supported by invoking the claim of Divine authority for it--no matter who or what claims such authority.
In very simple terms, disruptive innovation takes place when a company, service, or product outperforms or is more affordable than current options, after going through changes. It seems quite clear that Trump is pursuing a form of Disruptive innovation strategy to enhance government efficiency, as evidenced by his latest cabinet selections. He isn't depending on experienced government employees who have a deeper understanding of the system than he does. He is appointing loyalists who will enable him to exert considerable influence across all government departments.
You definition seems eerily close to one that guy who uses the term "synergy" and the phrase "in this space". Being entrenched in the system like a tick on a dog is not "a deeper understanding."
Keyword being disruptive I suppose, but I do agree that every President exerts influence...keyword "politics."
Yes, realize that you're likely too old, too smart, and too independent to vote Democrat. Let it burn.
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams