Markk wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 11:40 pm
canpakes wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 9:41 pm
Are those the same Democrat insiders that were running the country for Biden?
You seem to trust their story, so you should have no problem with the results of their decisions, right? ; )
Lol, why do you always use the blink emoji?
Silly Markk. That’s a ‘wink’, emoji, not a ‘blink’ emoji. I have buckets of these things that I grabbed at a MySpace surplus liquidation sale a decade back, so I use them freely.
But, seriously - I use them to indicate I’m being half-serious. : )
I use the Lol, way too much, in that I generally laugh a lot. Right or wrong, I like to laugh and have a good time....do you blink at people after you give your opinions to them? Do you give the ok sign when you blink at folks?
I generally end up looking like I’m having a spastic attack. Sometimes I have to stop people from dialing 911 when I go into one of my uncontrolled fits of winking. Ain’t nobody got time for that.
Some of those folks may have been running the auto pen, Trapper and Thompson said there were 5 people by committee that pulled the strings for Joe. Based on everything I hope we find out the truth.
Where did I say I trust what they are saying?
If you trust Tapper’s account and others from the book, then - by extension - you are trusting the people who were within the inner circle of the
Great Biden Senile Genius Sleepy Master Criminal Deception Operation. As they were ‘in’ on the plan, they become the ones helping to implement it. Unless they just collated the necessary work for the day and paid some college students on Task Rabbit to handle it all, right?
I have laid out pretty clear that there are not many options, Fox and other conservative outlets consistently held that Biden was suffering with mental decline.
As you’ve noted before, they were saying that in 2018. This has always been a standard talking point used against old politicians. Don’t pretend that you don’t know how that game is played. As it was, it took 7 years to become widely apparent, and he somehow managed to run against Trump in - as you claim - a state of severe cognitive decline yet win decisively anyway. He went on to make enough public appearances over the years afterwards to consistently demonstrate more apparent competency than his defeated opponent.
You don't have a lot of choices here. But I am open to hear your opinion.
I have all of the choices available, because aside from the debate performance, there doesn’t seem to be any other incident or action that can be pointed to that was critically problematic.
I’d assume that the book would be describing things that needed to be handled ‘by committee’ that were different from how Presidents usually have staff handle things … by committee. That’s how things normally get done. I certainly hope that you’re not going to tell me that you believe Trump is actually penning all of the Executive Orders and proclamations on the White House website. Or has even written better than a paragraph of any of them. If you do, I have a couple of crates of wink emojis that I’d like to sell you. ; )
<— product sample
