Another UK arrest linked to Epstein .. how is it going over there?

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
Post Reply
Chap
God
Posts: 3243
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 8:42 am
Location: On the imaginary axis

Another UK arrest linked to Epstein .. how is it going over there?

Post by Chap »

This morning, plain clothes police arrested the former British Ambassador to the United States, Lord Peter Mandelson on suspicion of misconduct in public office. He is thought to have released confidential financial information to Epstein while a cabinet minister at the time of the great financial crash of 2008. Two houses are currently being searched by police.

See the story here:

Peter Mandelson arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office
Video footage shows former peer being driven away shortly after being escorted from his London home by officers


Image

We have already deprived a Prince, younger brother of the King, of his princely title and his Dukedom and arrested him on similar charges. His homes are being searched. Now the US is a much bigger country with many more important people who were in close contact with Epstein, including, it seems, the President (how many times is he referred to in the Epstein files?).

So our score so far is a Prince and an Ambassador. I suppose you must have arrested quite a few more important people in connection with Epstein linked crimes. What is the total so far?

Oh ... . Really? How come?
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
Mayan Elephant:
Not only have I denounced the Big Lie, I have denounced the Big lie big lie.
User avatar
Dr. Shades
Founder and Visionary
Posts: 3211
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:48 pm
Contact:

Re: Another UK arrest linked to Epstein .. how is it going over there?

Post by Dr. Shades »

Chap wrote:
Mon Feb 23, 2026 7:52 pm
Now the US is a much bigger country with many more important people who were in close contact with Epstein, including, it seems, the President (how many times is he referred to in the Epstein files?).
Trump is mentioned more in the Epstein files than Jesus is mentioned in the Bible.
.
"When the Mormon God requires a PR crisis to act moral, we've clearly outgrown him."

--Everybody Wang Chung, 06-01-2026
Philo Sofee
God
Posts: 6020
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 1:18 am

Re: Another UK arrest linked to Epstein .. how is it going over there?

Post by Philo Sofee »

Dr. Shades wrote:
Mon Feb 23, 2026 11:46 pm
Chap wrote:
Mon Feb 23, 2026 7:52 pm
Now the US is a much bigger country with many more important people who were in close contact with Epstein, including, it seems, the President (how many times is he referred to in the Epstein files?).
Trump is mentioned more in the Epstein files than Jesus is mentioned in the Bible.
Indeed... it is fascinating that no one in America is even being investigated... sigh.....such a great nation gone to waste. Makes me almost believe in the scriptures again about the positively evil last days before the 2nd coming. If this isn't evil, I have no idea what is. And America sleeps..........just wow.
Chap
God
Posts: 3243
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 8:42 am
Location: On the imaginary axis

Re: Another UK arrest linked to Epstein .. how is it going over there?

Post by Chap »

I don't like to keep harping on about this, but a quite entertaining journalist has written on the topic of this thread:

So Epstein buddies Andrew and Mandelson have been arrested in the UK. And in the US? Zero, zip, nada
At least the British gave us the perp-walk shots. But I fear that any Americans seeking real justice will have to wait, and wait, and wait


Marina Hyde, Guardian, 24/02/2026

Read the last paragraph - the horrible thing is that it may well be true. Hell, here it is, in case you are too lazy to scroll down:

"So hard to say. Alas, with infinite reluctance, I also have another theory on the Epstein scandal. No one else is going to be convicted for the sex stuff. No one at all. All those women, girls – children? – unavenged. No one, bar the dead man and the incarcerated woman, is ever going to get convicted, nor almost certainly ever even get charged, either here or in the US. It may even be – indeed, is likely to be – that the biggest names from whom the public would really, really like to hear more are never even questioned. They will continue to be big shots, or under the radar, or people who simply don’t fear a knock at the door, because they understand perfectly well how the system works. And they always did."
I can’t believe the cops didn’t max out the theatrics yesterday when taking Peter Mandelson to the police station to help with their inquiries. They didn’t even do that thing where they put their hand on top of the suspect’s head to ease him down into the back seat of the car. Absolutely no sense of occasion.

And you know, they really may as well have had one. Misconduct in a public office is such an archaic old law and so incredibly difficult to prove that it may well be that you have already seen the high-water mark of law-adjacent consequences for both Mandy and Andy. The perp walk is the punishment. No offence to the highly esteemed Metropolitan police and the various other forces who’ve found the rare grooming-gang scandal they can be arsed with, but it’s hard to get past the deep-rooted suspicion that they are just looking busy. But look, we got one iconic royal photo out of it and a clip of Mandelson over which you could wonder absentmindedly, “Is this honestly the first time he’s been arrested? I must be having a deja vu because it hasn’t happened before, yet it feels so weirdly familiar. For whatever reason.” Anyway, allow me to reiterate that both of the men mentioned in this paragraph deny any wrongdoing.

So, in the UK, two guys have been arrested in connection with the Epstein scandal: a famously very clever one and a famously very thick one. What unites them? I have a theory about the many, many friends of Jeffrey. And that is that the more desiccated and vulnerable the milieu they hail from, the greater the chance that they may feel the not-very-full force of the law. This may be why the only two arrests we have seen – bar Epstein himself and his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell – are from the British monarchy and the upper echelon of establishment British politics. Are either of these institutions in rude and red-toothed health? Erm, answer unnecessary. But if you are one of Jeffrey’s big shots in big tech, or a high roller from high finance – well, as Holly Golightly once noted of the reassuring facade of Tiffany’s, nothing very bad could happen to you there.

In fact, looking at what appears to have occurred, I’m not sure very much bad can happen to you in the US as far as Epstein association is concerned. You hear a lot about the British establishment but the American establishment has covered itself in even less glory. Come on, America – you’ve got to arrest someone. Haven’t you? Even just one, for appearances’ sake? Maybe pick up one of the little people, the ones who cleaned up after whatever took place with the girls, and book them for being an accessory. Again, just for appearances’ sake.

The thing about even conservative estimates of what Jeffrey Epstein was up to for literally decades is that an awful lot of people would logically have to be involved. Even those right at the top of the Trump administration say so. The billionaire commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, recently assured the world that Jeffrey Epstein was “the greatest blackmailer ever”. Yet apparently this all-time epic blackmail enterprise needed only one guy (deceased) to run it. Nobody else, at all, had anything to do with it, not even knowledge of it. Even if we accept that preposterous premise, who does Howard reckon was being blackmailed by history’s greatest blackmailer? Presumably quite a few people, presumably most of them sufficiently high-profile that they had enough to lose to pay up? It would be good if this supposedly fearless US administration, or the FBI, or any of America’s hundreds of thousands of law enforcement officers or 1.3 million active lawyers(!) could produce a single name and state them an active person of interest – and even better if they formally decided to bring them in for questioning for so much as five minutes. And yet, nothing and no one has been brought even near justice except for Jeffrey and Ghislaine. For what we have long been assured was a huge criminal enterprise, Epstein Inc seems to have been a real mom-and-pop business.

Not to the women and girls who were victims of it, of course. When the last batch of files was released earlier this month, almost 100 survivors noted their identities had been compromised in thousands of documents and photos, while they claimed that many of those who were their abusers remained protected. The Department of Justice later said that revealing victims’ names and addresses and bank details and whatnot was due to “technical or human error”. No doubt, no doubt. Why oh why does genuinely unbelievable ineptitude continue to dog this era-defining investigation?

So hard to say. Alas, with infinite reluctance, I also have another theory on the Epstein scandal. No one else is going to be convicted for the sex stuff. No one at all. All those women, girls – children? – unavenged. No one, bar the dead man and the incarcerated woman, is ever going to get convicted, nor almost certainly ever even get charged, either here or in the US. It may even be – indeed, is likely to be – that the biggest names from whom the public would really, really like to hear more are never even questioned. They will continue to be big shots, or under the radar, or people who simply don’t fear a knock at the door, because they understand perfectly well how the system works. And they always did.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
Mayan Elephant:
Not only have I denounced the Big Lie, I have denounced the Big lie big lie.
User avatar
Doctor Steuss
God
Posts: 2580
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 8:48 pm

Re: Another UK arrest linked to Epstein .. how is it going over there?

Post by Doctor Steuss »

When Trump's DOJ is actively suppressing documents (besides the violations of the Epstein Files Transparency Act in how they've redacted what has been released), the best the United States will be able to hope for is a handful of famous people losing their jobs, being removed from boards, and/or having momentarily social shame.

We have about a third of Americans (a few of which post on this very board) who think raping children is ok, as long as it's done by someone that they view as being on their "team."

It's gross, depressing, enraging, and exceptionally difficult to mentally and emotionally process. I hope MAGA never stops wearing their hats and flying their flags, so normal people will always know they aren't safe to have children left alone with them.

The woman who directly named Trump in her abuse allegation claimed that around 1983, when she was around 13 years old, Epstein introduced her to Trump "who subsequently forced her head down to his exposed penis which she subsequently bit. In response, Trump punched her in the head and kicked her out."

Out of more than three million pages of files released by the Justice Department in recent months, this specific allegation against Trump only appears in copies of the FBI list of claims and the DOJ slideshow.

But a review of FBI case file logs and discovery documents turned over to Maxwell and her attorneys in the criminal case against her point to one place the claim could have come from — and how serious investigators took it.

The FBI interviewed this Trump and Epstein accuser four times. That is according to an FBI "Serial Report" and a list of Non-Testifying Witness Material in the Maxwell case that were also released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Only the first interview, conducted July 24, 2019, is in the public database. That interview does not mention Trump.

Of 15 documents listed in a log of the Maxwell discovery material for this first accuser, only seven are in the Epstein files database. Those missing also include notes that accompany three of the interviews. The discrepancy in the file for the Trump accuser was first reported by independent journalist Roger Sollenberger.

According to NPR's review of three different sets of serial numbers stamped onto the files, there appear to be 53 pages of interview documents and notes missing from the public Epstein database.
Link
Post Reply