Michael Jochum
is in Arvada, CO.
What Trump’s Maniacal UN Speech Actually Revealed
I subjected myself to all 37 minutes of Donald Trump’s latest grievance marathon at the United Nations General Assembly again this morning, and frankly, the spectacle was less of a diplomatic address and more of an international hostage situation. Reuters and the AP dutifully dressed it up in the polite terminology of journalism, reporting that he "defended his administration's foreign-policy," whined about the International Criminal Court, and took a victory lap for unilaterally dragging us into a catastrophic war with Iran. He even threw in some incoherent word salad about artificial intelligence for flavor. But those are just the sterile transcript notes. The actual performance? That requires translating delusion into English.
It’s endlessly tempting for pundits to treat his millions of enablers as though they’re operating from a unified, sophisticated manifesto. They aren't. Let’s stop pretending everyone cheering this on is motivated by a nuanced critique of pre-2016 geopolitical norms. Some are simply addicted to the cruelty masquerading as a "confrontational style." Trump being Trump what-have you. Some buy into the economic snake oil, while others just enjoy watching the arson of established institutions. We do ourselves a disservice by dignifying this collective, visceral grievance as a coherent political philosophy. It’s not. It’s performative, political rot.
What actually turns my stomach isn't the mere fact that Americans disagree, disagreement is the baseline price of admission in a democracy. It’s what this endless barrage of venom normalizes. We are living under a rhetorical regime that brands compromise as treason, expertise as a sinister elitist plot, and basic institutional competence as an obstacle to be bulldozed. You don’t have to parse the finer points of UN diplomacy to see the rot; you just have to look at what kind of sycophantic, bootlicking conduct is actively rewarded in his orbit.
We are miles past the quaint days of right versus left. The burning question now is whether this country can even agree on gravity, let alone debate public conduct using shared facts. We are being asked to nod along, clapping like trained seals, while a reality-TV caricature plays tough guy on the world stage, demanding we confuse bluster for strength, unapologetic ignorance for conviction, and a cheap carnival act for leadership. We don't have to agree on the reflection we see in our political leaders, but we’d better be willing to admit when the glass is shattered.
Mirrors, after all, only work if you're willing to open your eyes. The burden falls on us to keep staring at this grotesque distortion of American leadership, and to force everyone else to confront the very real, very bloody record backing up the spectacle.
Michael Jochum — Not Just a Drummer: Reflections on Art, Music, Politics, Dogs, and the Human Condition. See less
