DonBradley wrote:Miss Taken wrote:Isn't McCain, a Veteran? For those of us who don't study American Politics, we immediately think of 'warmonger'. In effect McCain, was a professional killer.
This is what I would have thought as well. But the relationship doesn't hold, at least not at the level of US Secretary of State. When a veteran serves as Secretary of State, the chances that US troops will be deployed
drops significantly. I don't know of any similar studies on the relationship of veteran status to a
president's likelihood of deploying troops, but the inverse relationship between veteran status and troop deployment for the Secretary of State suggests that having
been a soldier may make one more judicious about putting those who are now soldiers in harm's way. How much does somebody like W. know what it's like to be a soldier??
Don
I don't see how "Veteran" translates into war monger. My guess is that most people who have seen combat feel the exact opposite.
Neither does it translate into professional killer. Most soldiers experience a strong revulsion to killing and never get over it. The innate human resistance to taking human life is quite strong. I recommend that you read the very fine book, "On Killing."
I'd much rather have someone who's experienced combat making decisions about sending our nation's sons and daughters into harm's way as opposed to someone for whom warfare, death, and killing are but theoretical abstractions. As the father of a draft-eligible son, I am not wild about the prospect of any foreign military adventures, particularly ones based on faulty intelligence, wishful thinking, ideological stupidity, and impenetrable cognitive dissonance.
As for Wilson, the great statesman was also a petty tyrant. My esteem for him dropped significantly when I learned of the oppressively tyrannical policies he imposed on the American public during WWI. For reference, I recommend the fine book "The Great Influenza."
God . . . "who mouths morals to other people and has none himself; who frowns upon crimes, yet commits them all; who created man without invitation, . . . and finally, with altogether divine obtuseness, invites this poor, abused slave to worship him ..."