Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:I see this a lot. I'm always curious about the things people don't like about Hillary Clinton. What are those things for you, DT?
She voted for the Iraq invasion and had a lot of wealthy donors. I really don't like money in politics.
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:But she has an incredibly sharp political mind, understands our state apparatus, and would've managed our government far better than Mr. Trump.
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:But she has an incredibly sharp political mind, understands our state apparatus, and would've managed our government far better than Mr. Trump.
- Doc
Yes I agree.
Knowing what you know now, would you have voted differently in 2016?
EAllusion wrote:2018 has officially come down as the fourth warmest year on record. The other three are 2015, 2016, and 2017. If not for a handful of votes in Florida in 2000, we might not be barreling towards a global catastrophe right now. I wish it weren't, but that statement isn't hyperbole.
Elections have consequences. Sometimes big ones. And if you can't tell the difference between Trump's pure malice tempered by incompetence and Harris's more ordinary prosecutorial terribleness on civil rights, you're getting worked. I know your politics well enough to know that a world in which Democrats feel punished for nominating Harris is a much worse world than one in which Donald Trump is defeated.
Okay. Let's forget about Harris's terrible record. What would a president Harris do for me?
Last edited by Guest on Sun Jan 27, 2019 2:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
canpakes wrote:Knowing what you know now, would you have voted differently in 2016?
I do like that Hillary is for stem cell research and SETI. Like I said in the opening post I do regret it.
Considering the job responsibilities of the President, do you believe that Trump shows better temperance, skill and qualifications than Harris, to remain in office for another 4 years?
canpakes wrote:Considering the job responsibilities of the President, do you believe that Trump shows better temperance, skill and qualifications than Harris, to remain in office for another 4 years?
what "job responsibilities" are you referencing? and a feral cat has better temperance, skill and qualifications than Harris...and yeah, Trump is waay more qualified for President than Harris.
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
canpakes wrote:Considering the job responsibilities of the President, do you believe that Trump shows better temperance, skill and qualifications than Harris, to remain in office for another 4 years?
what "job responsibilities" are you referencing? and a feral cat has better temperance, skill and qualifications than Harris...and yeah, Trump is waay more qualified for President than Harris.
Lol. The question wasn't for you as I already know how you'll vote, and why. ; )
canpakes wrote:Considering the job responsibilities of the President, do you believe that Trump shows better temperance, skill and qualifications than Harris, to remain in office for another 4 years?
Harris is probably better than Trump, but if she wins the primaries I would be willing to wait 4 more years to get someone better in 2024.
Ruth Bader Ginsberg will certainly leave a vacancy in the Supreme Court in the next six years. She will only leave during Trump's final two years if her health makes hanging in there impossible, and we all know how likely it is for McConnell to be fair with his holding off on hearings in an election year when it's a Republican President putting forward the nomination no matter how controversial the Presidency. If Hillary Clinton had won in 2016, Ginsberg would have already retired. Clinton would have nominated two Supreme Court justices with a likely third depending on how Kennedy had reacted to a Clinton presidency.
You, DT, are seriously entertaining the idea of either voting for Trump or not participating in 2020 if Harris gets the Democrat nomination after all of the discussion about the consequences of Bernie Bros not voting for Clinton just from the impact on the courts? You think you have four years of cushion in the buffer between authoritarian takeover of the Republic built into the system that would allow you to hope for one of your preferred candidates to win the nomination in 2024? That's a bad reading of the current political environment.
The world is always full of the sound of waves..but who knows the heart of the sea, a hundred feet down? Who knows it's depth? ~ Eiji Yoshikawa
