I never spoke with him about his business dealings

[Gadianton]

Glad to see you've survived the Omicron variant Gad, but more importantly I'm glad to see the Democrats were able to cover up for the CCP for unleashing this virus on the world

most likely, the ccp didn't unleash it on purpose given what it's done to their own country and the general inability to control such a weapon. However, if I'm wrong, and if the ccp and Democrats got everything they wanted out of the virus, then why not just create another one and release it? Since the only good people of the world don't believe in lockdowns or vaccination, and are the main victims, they could be rid of all of you in a handful of easy iterations.

First of all there's the small fact that it takes me four years and 200,000 medicaid eye exams to earn $1.2 million rather than just a promise of a 15 minute off the books meeting with my old man.

Okay, so you have to work harder than Ivanka, Don Jr. and the rest of the relatives riding DT's coat tail. That's true for most of us. I also have to work harder than Donald Trump's children, Ajax. And I have to be a whole lot better at what I do to justify that much smaller paycheck.

What happened to the paying your fair share B.S. you preach? I know I would never get away with a couple years probation and no jail time.

Right, but DT has got away with no jail time at all for those kinds of crimes; others have taken the fall for him. Let me clue you in on the reality of "politics" playing a role in prosecution. I recently saw (not Netflix) documentary about Jeffrey Epstein. Forget about whether he was friendlier with democrats or republicans -- it was probably democrats as he donated so much to science and republicans don't believe in science -- the documentarian pointed out Epstein's undoing was Donald Trump's presidency. Not because Trump was guilty of more crimes while flying the Lolita express than Bill Clinton, but because Donald Trump's presidency put him in the spotlight. Well, Trump's presidency put somebody else in the spotlight also -- Trump. Trump is a career white-collar criminal. We can make the case that other rich people do the same things he does, and that's true, but he takes those tactics to the extreme. But it's possible he, like Epstein, could have gotten away with it forever if he hadn't become president, or if he toned it down once he became president, but instead, he took his criminality to dizzying new heights. Yeah, that's gonna make him a target.

But that's how things have to be in your opinion, right?

You're not going to be financially better off under Trump as a life-long dictator. And if you wish to cheat on your taxes and keep more money it's easier to do than you think it is, but there's risk involved. The difference between Donald Trump and you isn't just that he has so much more money than you, it's that he has the balls to take the risk. There are many wealthy people closer to your level of income who cheat on their taxes and get away with it. Especially when we're talking about mid-level drug dealers who can't be honest out of risk of getting caught for something worse than taxes. I've known people who have known those kinds of people and I've talked tax strategy. The problem with you Ajax, is that you're an honest man. You may be completely unhinged and live a rich fantasy life, but what it comes down to is that you're to scared to lie for yourself -- you can vote for an avowed liar as it makes you feel empowered by extension but nothing he's done are things that help your wallet.

Look, I'm corruptible enough that if I thought Trump or any other right-wing president was going to give me say, 20% more real spending power over and above a Democrat president then I might very well vote with my wallet. But I see nothing that indicates an unhinged right-wing president is going to help me financially.

[canpakes]

I didn’t realize that Joe was either President or VP in July of 2017.

This Deeper State goes even deeperer than I expected.

First of all Joe Biden said he never spoke with Hunter about his business dealings.

Well, I’m with Doc Stu on this one. It would be pretty difficult for close family members to not talk about their respective business activities. I’ve always been skeptical of Joe’s claim.

But, assuming that this wasn’t Hunter chastising Zhang about not sending the check for the Girl Scout cookies he promised to order, this is extremely bothersome to you, because … ?

But somehow when it comes toJoe Biden, it's ok to lie in your view as long as he was protecting his son.

Protecting his son from what? What does this lie prove to you, other than this statement was a lie? Be specific.

I’m not figuring that this is all about ‘the lie’ itself. That would be crazy inconsistent considering your uncritical support of the prior President. So, what’s the actual beef?

[Vēritās]

This doesn't prove Joe Biden lied about anything.

Think about this for a second.

For years we've been told by Republicans that Hunter Biden is a liar and an opportunist who likes to use his Father's name to further his business dealings.

Now, suddenly, the notion that Hunter is lying in an attempt to use his father's name, seems impossible to them.

The fact is this text has no context to it so there is really no way to offer an informed comment without it. This is the sort of "drip drip" nonsense that took place while they were "revealing" stuff from the three bogus "whistleblowers" last month, along with the nonsensical Durham investigation which even Matt Gaetz was forced to mock when he grilled Durham on the House floor yesterday. Yesterday Adam Schiff questioned Durham and Durham said he never even read the Mueller Report. That's right. The man the Trump DOJ appointed to find out if the Mueller Probe was warranted, never even bothered to read the report!

I'm also reminded of the Bobulinski interview with Tucker Carlson three years ago when he alluded to one snippet of an email that referred to the "Big Guy." Bobulinski insisted the Big Guy was Joe Biden and that the email proved he was engaged in business with his son in Ukraine.

What we ended up learning much later, however, and only after Democrats were allowed access to the materials, is that the same email chain revealed that whoever the Big Guy was, he didn't want any part of the deal. Oh, and that the deal never happened. Bobulinski failed to share those important details, but instead alluded to "many damning documents" that he had and would reveal soon.

Those documents ended up being put on a flash drive which, for some inexplicable reason, were never copied before because sent, and when it got lost in the mail, Tucker started a conspiracy about how it got lost. But then once the flash drive was found, Tucker changed his mind after reviewing the "damning documents" and said he didn't want to cover the story anymore because Hunter was a "broken man" and he didn't want to kick him while he was down. When it is most likely the case the "damning documents" he had promised turned out to be not so damning after all.

[ajax18]

First of all Joe Biden said he never spoke with Hunter about his business dealings.

Well, I’m with Doc Stu on this one. It would be pretty difficult for close family members to not talk about their respective business activities. I’ve always been skeptical of Joe’s claim.

But, assuming that this wasn’t Hunter chastising Zhang about not sending the check for the Girl Scout cookies he promised to order, this is extremely bothersome to you, because … ?

But somehow when it comes toJoe Biden, it's ok to lie in your view as long as he was protecting his son.

Protecting his son from what? What does this lie prove to you, other than this statement was a lie? Be specific.

I’m not figuring that this is all about ‘the lie’ itself. That would be crazy inconsistent considering your uncritical support of the prior President. So, what’s the actual beef?

What do you think China was paying Hunter this money for?

[Vēritās]

Well, I’m with Doc Stu on this one. It would be pretty difficult for close family members to not talk about their respective business activities. I’ve always been skeptical of Joe’s claim.

But, assuming that this wasn’t Hunter chastising Zhang about not sending the check for the Girl Scout cookies he promised to order, this is extremely bothersome to you, because … ?



Protecting his son from what? What does this lie prove to you, other than this statement was a lie? Be specific.

I’m not figuring that this is all about ‘the lie’ itself. That would be crazy inconsistent considering your uncritical support of the prior President. So, what’s the actual beef?

What do you think China was paying Hunter this money for?

There is no evidence "China" was paying him for anything.

[Vēritās]

So with the recent Gary Shapley interview, the transcript is available online with interviews attached from FBI who interviews Hunter Biden associate Rob Walker shortly after they obtained the Hunter Laptop and began investigating for potential crimes. They specifically asked who the "Big Guy" was.

I'm guess there will be no mention of these excerpts on FOX or Newsmax and Brietbart won't be reporting it anytime soon either. Why? Because now we have Devon Archer and Rob Walker, two associates in the know who refute Tony Bobulinski's claims on Tucker Carlson.

Slide1.jpg

Slide2.jpg

[canpakes]

Protecting his son from what? What does this lie prove to you, other than this statement was a lie? Be specific.

I’m not figuring that this is all about ‘the lie’ itself. That would be crazy inconsistent considering your uncritical support of the prior President. So, what’s the actual beef?

What do you think China was paying Hunter this money for?

There’s no mention of money. And if it was involved, this mysterious ‘transcript’ sounds as if the situation was the reverse, and that the mysterious Zhang wasn’t delivering on some service that may have been promised to or paid for by Biden.

Have you got an image of these supposed screen captures? Because, the way that story is written, it sounds like you’re being punked.

And, try answering the question that I asked. ; )

[Some Schmo]

This country is lost. There are too many stupid people that think there is some kind of relevance between Hunter Biden and national politics. Too many people have bought into suspicion of education, and America is overwrought with damned morons. And that's putting it mildly.

[ceeboo]

Hey SS

This country is lost.

Lost? Perhaps. At the very least, I think this country is rapidly approaching a point where the destruction and division that is taking place may not be repairable.

There are too many stupid people that think there is some kind of relevance between Hunter Biden and national politics.

If it's just Hunter, I would agree with you but there seems to be some fairly credible allegations that Joe has been involved with these shady allegations. So, as American citizens, shouldn't all of us at least take a brief pause from our political allegiances and desire the truth wherever that truth leads? In my opinion, not wanting to look into and/or even consider the allegations being made against Joe Biden would be stupid on steroids.

America is overwrought with damned morons. And that's putting it mildly.

I can't argue with you here.

[Moksha]

This country is lost. There are too many stupid people that think there is some kind of relevance between Hunter Biden and national politics. Too many people have bought into suspicion of education, and America is overwrought with damned morons. And that's putting it mildly.

It is also a Republican talking point, much like Benghazi.