In a sane party . . .

[ceeboo]

I have to assume that this idea (shooting protestors) is acceptable to Ajax, Markk, HoH, and ceeboo. They happily voted for it.

In a sane person....... writing the above about specific board members will not be found.

I have to assume that your political ideology has blinded you from recognizing and understanding basic levels of responsible posting.

[Some Schmo]

I have to assume that your political ideology has blinded you from recognizing and understanding basic levels of responsible posting.

Like you'd know. Habitual lying is "responsible posting" to you.

[Kishkumen]

In a sane person....... writing the above about specific board members will not be found.

I have to assume that your political ideology has blinded you from recognizing and understanding basic levels of responsible posting.

I think it would be intellectually irresponsible and dishonest not to conclude that your vote for Trump was accompanied by some level of acceptance of his desire to shoot protestors. You knew it. If you did not know that particular thing, you knew one of the many other vile, disqualifying things he has said or done. They are legion. January 6 is inescapable. It is rock bottom.

You bear some share with of responsibility for putting that sicko in office. We knew what he was. We tried to reason with you. You went ahead. And if you did not vote, you passively contributed to his victory. And you defend him at any rate, something that is clearly insane.

[Some Schmo]

Political ideology has blinded Kish? I don't really see him talking political ideology as much as I see him talking about morals and ethics. MAGA is not a political ideology. It's a set of anti-morals, anti-ethics and lawlessness.

You're projecting again. Political ideology has completely blinded you. It's ripped your eyes out of your face and shoved them up your ass.

[Kishkumen]

Political ideology has blinded Kish? I don't really see him talking political ideology as much as I see him talking about morals and ethics. MAGA is not a political ideology. It's a set of anti-morals, anti-ethics and lawlessness.

You're projecting again. Political ideology has completely blinded you. It's ripped your eyes out of your face and shoved them up your ass.

Maybe anti-tyranny? I am very anti-tyrant. It has blinded me from tolerating tyranny and its supporters.

[Chap]

Trump would have disqualified himself when it was learned that he asked then Defense Secretary Mark Esper if they could “shoot protestors in the legs.”

https://www.npr.org/2022/05/09/10975174 ... -secretary

I have to assume that this idea (shooting protestors) is acceptable to Ajax, Markk, HoH, and ceeboo. They happily voted for it.

To which Ceeboo replies:

I have to assume that this idea (shooting protestors) is acceptable to Ajax, Markk, HoH, and ceeboo. They happily voted for it.

In a sane person....... writing the above about specific board members will not be found.

I have to assume that your political ideology has blinded you from recognizing and understanding basic levels of responsible posting.

So presumably you don't approve of Trump asking about shooting protestors in the legs? I mean, that is what he did do, quoting from the testimony given in the article Kishkumen linked:

Esper said he and other top officials were caught off guard by Trump's reaction to the unrest in the summer of 2020.

"The president was enraged," Esper recalled. "He thought that the protests made the country look weak, made us look weak and 'us' meant him. And he wanted to do something about it.

"We reached that point in the conversation where he looked frankly at [Joint Chiefs of Staff] Gen. [Mark] Milley and said, 'Can't you just shoot them, just shoot them in the legs or something?' ... It was a suggestion and a formal question. And we were just all taken aback at that moment as this issue just hung very heavily in the air."

Trump can't stand looking like what his father called 'a loser'. His recent action in wasting millions sending in the Marines to what is really an LAPD job shows he is acting out again. If you voted for this man, are you pleased by the way he is behaving?

[canpakes]

Trump would have disqualified himself when it was learned that he asked then Defense Secretary Mark Esper if they could “shoot protestors in the legs.”

https://www.npr.org/2022/05/09/10975174 ... -secretary

I have to assume that this idea (shooting protestors) is acceptable to Ajax, Markk, HoH, and ceeboo. They happily voted for it.

To which Ceeboo replies:

In a sane person....... writing the above about specific board members will not be found.

I have to assume that your political ideology has blinded you from recognizing and understanding basic levels of responsible posting.

So presumably you don't approve of Trump asking about shooting protestors in the legs?

Seems like a simple ‘no’ would have been a more efficient way to disagree with Kish’s statement, rather than eschewing a clear answer in favor of penning two sentences of equivocation and redirection.

[Gadianton]

So presumably you don't approve of Trump asking about shooting protestors in the legs?

Per Ceeboo that's just "campaign rhetoric" no big deal.

In response to Marcus' query on an other thread, I believe the only time Ceeboo backed up his sweeping claims over Biden's failure at the border with actual information was claiming he let in 20 million illegals.