I attempted to allow for that in my response. It looks like I was not successful.Some Schmo wrote: ↑Thu Mar 17, 2022 4:48 pmYou're using the word 'effort' in a sense that I don't mean it.
I'm using it in the premeditated sense of the word.
And maybe you will one day see your current beliefs as being the equivalent of Santa Claus and magic. It could also be that your sense of what Santa Claus and magic are all about is at the root of a problem you will one day overcome.Certainly, when I was a kid. I grew up. It was easy to believe in Santa Claus and magic when I was a kid, too.
Yes, it looked pretty self-congratulatory. I'll be honest. I do agree with you that getting upset ideally should move people to reexamine their assumptions and beliefs. At the same time, outgrowing Santa Claus and magic are not the only legitimate results. Outgrowing certain simplistic ideas about Santa Claus and magic may be legitimate alternatives to rejecting them completely.The point of my post is questioning why people hold on to beliefs if they get upset upon having those beliefs challenged. I'm not surprised by people getting upset. I suspect it's because we understand at some level there's something wrong with the belief, primarily because any time I've gotten upset over a cherished notion, it was because I was wrong about something. Of course it's our own internal experience and perception of the world around us. Nobody escapes that.
I'm not questioning why people get upset, but why they don't use it as a signal to question their beliefs.
At the very least they may be accepted as harmless alternatives in others even if they don't work for you.
Evolves or is overturned when the limitations of old models make them unsustainable. Scientific experts are good for science, and science is not good for everything. The assumption that science is universally capable is an ideology, not science.It wouldn't surprise me, particularly. I follow scientific experts. The accuracy of anything comes down to the precision in which it's expressed, something else that evolves over time.
Again, my statement was intended to be read in both senses, but I see it did not succeed.People do get worked up about the "non-existence of Divinity." They all have different reasons for it, but that's an accurate statement. Some get worked up at the suggestion there is nothing divine. I imagine many others get worked up because they have to contend with people believing in divinity, and everything that implies. Reasons will vary.