Markk wrote: ↑Thu Apr 24, 2025 7:14 pm
Doctor Steuss wrote: ↑Thu Apr 24, 2025 5:33 pm
I imagine the left's plan was the bipartisan legislation that would have increased the number of agents, funding for improved technology for border patrol and protection, increased the number of immigration judges to help clear the backlog, and funding for the lawyers to represent unaccompanied minors.
It's unfortunate that legislation was tanked solely because someone didn't want Biden to get the credit. Curiously, similar legislation hasn't already been drafted and passed by the right now that they are in power of every branch of government. It's almost as if some people don't want the problem to be actually "fixed" in any meaningful way, because they know it's a useful tool to distract people that care about the Constitution and human rights, and to placate supporters who need a perpetual scapegoat.
Someone should let them know that if they actually do something to help fix the border, they can always fall back on claiming black people are eating people's pets.
CFR...I would like to take a look at the plan and how it would have operated getting the gang members and criminals here in front of the federal judges.
Also keep in mine Trump basically shut down the border in a month or two, with executive orders and by allowing folks do what they were hired to do. Biden could have done the very same things.
Anyways give me a link to what legislation you are talking about?
You seem to be incredibly confused about how our court systems work. Getting gang members and criminals here in front of federal judges has nothing to do with immigration. That's Attorney Generals, the Department of Justice, and local law enforcement.
As far as the things I stated it would do (increase the number of agents, improve technology, and increase the number of judges), here's the text.
S.4361 - Border Act of 2024. Of note, this was endorsed by the National Border Control Council (who represents the thousands of border agents and personnel).
I did get one thing wrong (for which I apologize -- I really do try to be accurate in my ranty ramblings). It didn't increase the number of judges. It substituted judicial review and oversight for the process that is currently overseen by USCIS for people crossing unlawfully, and it also would have sped up the asylum screening process (and made more restrictive standards for acceptance) which would have freed up a significant amount of time for judges to get through the backlog of people already in the country. It did, however, have funding for the administrative side to help streamline everything for judges (i.e. lawyers, law clerks, paralegals, etc.).
It would have also increased funding to expand ICE detention centers (a whopping 47% increase in capacity), and to continue construction of the border wall (that Trump failed at).