Ahhh, the Democratic party base. As you have now just summarily excused yourself from the realm of serious discourse, you are dismissed.
Oh wow, well here's another thing then.
Anyone who thinks there's any difference between the democratic and the republican needs a head-check.
Both are funded by generally the same-type lobbyists --
This explains why almost totaly unkown personalities appear on the scene as presidential candidates, because they're funded by the corporational interests.
The left and right are just an illusion, and really both more of the same. They both have the same broad worldview ... you might wanna ask yourself why, for example, a person with Buddhist world-view has yet to run for president -- simply that they wouldn't be a friend to the corporations.
In Australia we're forced to vote, but there's a lot of grownig sentiment towards politics and I think in future we're going to see a big dissolution of politics here. I know many people who will refuse to vote at the upcoming Victorian state elections for example.
Way to move the goal posts, skippy. First you say "The government did it" and after you get called on it you backpeddle into "the Government let it happy". This is going to be too easy.
Not really, if they let it happen they still did it. It's the same as the Jesus character quote about a man hating someone has murdered in his heart.
So basically what you're saying is that the US Airforce failed to protect us from a threat that they were not designed to defend us against, weren't authorized to defend us against, and until that day had NEVER EXISTED BEFORE. Good job, slack wit, you've managed to impress me with how stupid another human being can actual become.
That's an excuse the Bush admin., has fed you and you've swallowed the poop they've fed ya! Hilarious.
"North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) is a joint organization of Canada and the United States that provides aerospace warning, air sovereignty and defense for North America."
This means full air defense. Lets take into account the ridiculous notion by Condoleeza Rice (couldn't care less about spelling of her name) when she mad the comment "I don't think anyone could have imagined that they would use hijacked airplanes as a missile." This would be ok, except when you realise that practice defense operations that had been carried out not too long prior 9/11 involved hijacked airlines with one of the targets being the WTC.
"In an attempt to explain NORAD's poor performance in the attacks on September 11, 2001, Bush Administration officers claimed that NORAD was never tasked to monitor the skies inside America, that the defense agency was tasked to "looking outward" on 9/11 only,[7] contradicting the historical fact that NORAD never ceased its "inward looking" mission of "Air Sovereignty"."
"Since the founding of NORAD in 1958 the defense organization has had three missions: (1) Surveillance and Control of the airspace covering the United States and Canada; (2) Warning the National Command Authorities of an aerospace attack approaching the North American continent; and (3) Providing a proper response to an aerospace attack approaching the North American continent."
There is no hint of military protection only, this is a 100% protection thing.
"What the hell is "patented thermite"? You do understand that thermite is a fairly old incindiary compound makes from aluminum and iron, right?"
Patented thermite is called thermate and is used especially by the deconstruction industry. It has a higher level of sulfate, among other things.
The burning plane and all to weaken the structure would work as a total theory - if the fires hadn't started to go out on both of the collapses and especially on one of the buildings which just had black smoke and nothing else. Then you also have to ask -- were things burning down the very bottom of the tower? I could understand if part of the building had collapsed, but there just wasn't enough damage for the perfect collapse we see. The very reason the buildings collapsed into their footprint is because of the sub-basement explosions, which we know happened because of witness testimony.
Building 7 was struck by a lot of burning debris from the two main towers, which in turn started fires that burned out of control for hours due to a lack of water and man power available to fight them. Pretty simple.
Take a look at the burning building, there were fires on only a few floors. The building was not burning furiously. I'm not going to speculate, but it collapses perfectly to the controlled demolition pattern.
At the end of the day, tall buildings don't fall at free-fall. A physics teacher will tell you that, and many have told me.
Ok, so now you;re saying that not only did the US Federal Government plan and carry out the 1993 WTC bombing, but they also carried out the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing?
Ok, I'm calling b***s*** and flat out demanding you present hard evidence for this. You just made a pair of extraordinary claims, both of which will require extraordinary evidence. So put up or shut up, boy.
Well I've already showed you a fairly credible article for the 1993 WTC attack. I could provide more if you wanted.
As I've said though, my issue isn't with what has happened so much as it is with what we can do to overthrow the society of sickness we are within. Simple thing is the government (esp. us govt) has declared war on it's own people. Through the "anti-terror" legislation many constitutional rights and civil liberties have been taken away. It has nothing to do with stopping terrorism, and everything to do with social control.
People are becoming tired of the status quo rubbish the government are feeding them, and the government invented the terorrist to try and censor people in any way they need to. You can pretty much be legally named a terrorist for disagreeing with official government statements or saying something "objectionable".
No, the problem is weak-minded and poorly educated morons like yourself that cannot engage their brain enough to use critical thinking and end up believing in stupid s*** like conspiracy theories.
What the problem comes down to is your critical thinking. Go and talk to, 25 physics teachers who are not biased in any way. Show them videos of the WTC collapsing, and you can bet that the majority, if they're honest and apply the laws of physics to their understanding of what they've seen -- they're not going to call it a regular collapse.
The problem is for most people that it's scarier for it to be their own government than a guy in a cave.
History repeats itself. Hitler staged a false-flag on the reichstag and blamed it on terrorists. He had "homeland security" and introduced it in much the same way as the US govt,.
Paraphrasing "There is a great evil that threatenes this great land, we must protect our homeland security".
Then we have Pearl Harbor, which we, especially in Australia because we warned FDR about the Japanese fleet know that the government allowed it to happen.
We know that the Lusitania was filled with explosives when it was hit, the german embassy even warned against travelling in this area -- but in the end this carried america into WWI.
Then we have the gulf of tonkin, and it now appears that didn't even happen.
Banking interests have always wanted the US to enter the war because it's an excellent way for profit and control.
Yeah, I guess dropping out of high school kinda forces you to hang out with other dumbasses like that.
Haha, are you online stalking me? I actually did drop out this year, but that was because I'd picked subjects which I shouldn't have and I was too far into the course of the year to change them so I'm returning for my final year next year.
The fact that you absolutely don't seem to be able to engage in a discussion without weak insults already shows the nature of your mind, and your ability to be intellect.
See, if you had stayed in school you'd have learned enough basic physics to know why it happened like that. You'd also be able to think and evaluate evidence. Here's an experiment. Set your house on fire, now observe if it eventually pancakes as you and the other retards think it should or if if turns into a big pile of flaming rubble.
& this is a dreadful example. a large skyscraper is a lot better engineered than a house. hah.
I actually don't see the point in giving you evidence because I think you're unlikely to go and buy the books I suggest anyway.
