Remembering Building 7

[BeNotDeceived]

That was the truth, you don't want to believe or accept it, fine, just don't call me a nutjob or tinfoil hat wearer because you can't handle the truth.

Lol. You need an asterisk after the word truth when you use it, to remind people it's YOUR conspiracy-nonsense-based "truth*" alone. As in, NOT TRUE. : D

The asterisk should be a disclaimer as a warning for people like you who don't have thick skin, but given the content on these boards, I'd have thought everyone here had thick skin. Guess not. Oh well, at least you read what I posted and now know the truth, what you choose to say about or do with it is your own business.

[Marcus]

Lol. You need an asterisk after the word truth when you use it, to remind people it's YOUR conspiracy-nonsense-based "truth*" alone. As in, NOT TRUE. : D

The asterisk should be a disclaimer as a warning for people like you who don't have thick skin, but given the content on these boards, I'd have thought everyone here had thick skin. Guess not. Oh well, at least you read what I posted and now know the truth, what you choose to say or do with it is your own business.

Alternatively, you could read up on what's been discussed here before on this topic. Your own jump to a thin-skinned set of personal insults when your nonsense isn't immediately accepted tells me you don't really intend to put any effort into communicating. If you're here just to shill for your documentary, then get to it and just leave your link. the gullible will eat it up, I'm sure. : D

[Gadianton]

Free speech in this nation is slowly being eroded.

Not so. Truth Social launches on Feb. 21st. You can let Shades know when you've got your stuff set up on there.

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

Lol. You need an asterisk after the word truth when you use it, to remind people it's YOUR conspiracy-nonsense-based "truth*" alone. As in, NOT TRUE. : D

The asterisk should be a disclaimer as a warning for people like you who don't have thick skin, but given the content on these boards, I'd have thought everyone here had thick skin. Guess not. Oh well, at least you read what I posted and now know the truth, what you choose to say about or do with it is your own business.

Post it again, link to it, and I’ll watch it before it bets pulled and/or the feds smoke you for knowing too much.

- Doc

[Gadianton]

It's a dice roll on where to start on sweeping conspiracy theories. In my opinion, aside from the more severe problem of no evidence, the main issue with conspiracy theories is that they are way too complicated. Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci engineer a world pandemic so that they can profit through back-channel investments, when all Bill needed to do was just continue to buy up farmland in the midwest and grab some Ethereum. Lex Luthor nukes the San Andreas fault in order to cash in on beachfront property.

Lots of techno-babel.

"all were killed upon impact and the computers and servers all the evidence was being kept on were all destroyed as well"

Uh huh. All the backups were on 3.5" floppy disks in the same section of building. Give me a break. Even if that were true, nobody would suspect such a ridiculous vulnerability. And even if such a ridiculous vulnerability existed, and somebody had knowledge of it, to exploit it by such a precisely orchestrated and overly elaborate scheme where all kinds of things could go wrong and ruin everything is ridiculous. What if one of the most important workers was home sick with a laptop? A laptop left at home or somebody in the lunchroom? What if the IT department suddenly realized their contract with Iron Mountain didn't cover that one department and started backing up right before the attack? What if the plane had crashed a little to the left or right, or too soon or late or not at all? The risk of planting all those charges, and then planning to recover the charges if the plane missed the target under drastically increased security.

And what's with all these conspirators being willing to work with each other to solve drastically unrelated problems? One guy has an asbestos problem, the other has financial records linked to Enron. Let's get everyone in a room and think how to fix all these problems on one day. "It's almost too easy..."

The only people who believe stupid crap like this are Cultellus-level regular guys.

And in this narrative, are the big insurance companies victims or co-conspirators?

Look, if some nobody could figure all this out in a few internet searches, then the twin tower insurers would have also figured it out and got out of paying Silverstein. And if apparently not, I'm sure some of those insurers are still around and would love a phone call from the person who can prove how they were defrauded.

[BeNotDeceived]

It's a dice roll on where to start on sweeping conspiracy theories. In my opinion, aside from the more severe problem of no evidence, the main issue with conspiracy theories is that they are way too complicated. Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci engineer a world pandemic so that they can profit through back-channel investments, when all Bill needed to do was just continue to buy up farmland in the midwest and grab some Ethereum. Lex Luthor nukes the San Andreas fault in order to cash in on beachfront property.

Lots of techno-babel.

"all were killed upon impact and the computers and servers all the evidence was being kept on were all destroyed as well"

Uh huh. All the backups were on 3.5" floppy disks in the same section of building. Give me a break. Even if that were true, nobody would suspect such a ridiculous vulnerability. And even if such a ridiculous vulnerability existed, and somebody had knowledge of it, to exploit it by such a precisely orchestrated and overly elaborate scheme where all kinds of things could go wrong and ruin everything is ridiculous. What if one of the most important workers was home sick with a laptop? A laptop left at home or somebody in the lunchroom? What if the IT department suddenly realized their contract with Iron Mountain didn't cover that one department and started backing up right before the attack? What if the plane had crashed a little to the left or right, or too soon or late or not at all? The risk of planting all those charges, and then planning to recover the charges if the plane missed the target under drastically increased security.

And what's with all these conspirators being willing to work with each other to solve drastically unrelated problems? One guy has an asbestos problem, the other has financial records linked to Enron. Let's get everyone in a room and think how to fix all these problems on one day. "It's almost too easy..."

The only people who believe stupid crap like this are Cultellus-level regular guys.

And in this narrative, are the big insurance companies victims or co-conspirators?

Look, if some nobody could figure all this out in a few internet searches, then the twin tower insurers would have also figured it out and got out of paying Silverstein. And if apparently not, I'm sure some of those insurers are still around and would love a phone call from the person who can prove how they were defrauded.

There were over 100,000 people involved in the Manhattan project... not one peeped.

[Marcus]

It's a dice roll on where to start on sweeping conspiracy theories. In my opinion, aside from the more severe problem of no evidence, the main issue with conspiracy theories is that they are way too complicated. Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci engineer a world pandemic so that they can profit through back-channel investments, when all Bill needed to do was just continue to buy up farmland in the midwest and grab some Ethereum. Lex Luthor nukes the San Andreas fault in order to cash in on beachfront property.

Lots of techno-babel.

"all were killed upon impact and the computers and servers all the evidence was being kept on were all destroyed as well"

Uh huh. All the backups were on 3.5" floppy disks in the same section of building. Give me a break. Even if that were true, nobody would suspect such a ridiculous vulnerability. And even if such a ridiculous vulnerability existed, and somebody had knowledge of it, to exploit it by such a precisely orchestrated and overly elaborate scheme where all kinds of things could go wrong and ruin everything is ridiculous. What if one of the most important workers was home sick with a laptop? A laptop left at home or somebody in the lunchroom? What if the IT department suddenly realized their contract with Iron Mountain didn't cover that one department and started backing up right before the attack? What if the plane had crashed a little to the left or right, or too soon or late or not at all? The risk of planting all those charges, and then planning to recover the charges if the plane missed the target under drastically increased security.

And what's with all these conspirators being willing to work with each other to solve drastically unrelated problems? One guy has an asbestos problem, the other has financial records linked to Enron. Let's get everyone in a room and think how to fix all these problems on one day. "It's almost too easy..."

The only people who believe stupid crap like this are Cultellus-level regular guys.

And in this narrative, are the big insurance companies victims or co-conspirators?

Look, if some nobody could figure all this out in a few internet searches, then the twin tower insurers would have also figured it out and got out of paying Silverstein. And if apparently not, I'm sure some of those insurers are still around and would love a phone call from the person who can prove how they were defrauded.

There were over 100,000 people involved in the Manhattan project... not one peeped.

Post your documentary. Let's see your 7 years worth of proof.

[K Graham]

The stupid is strong in this thread.

[Physics Guy]

Many memoirs by participants in the Manhattan Project have been published. They started coming out soon after the war.

Los Alamos has a museum with a gift shop. The museum opened in 1953. I don't know when the gift shop started.

[Chap]

The stupid is strong in this thread.

Er, yes.

And if there really is such a huge conspiracy backed by ruthless elite interests capable of planning mass homicides ... why is BeNotDeceived still alive and posting his exposés freely on obscure ex-Mormon discussion boards like this one?

He, heh. I have just reported him to headquarters. We won't be hearing from him again ... That's not a threat or a disinvitation, of course. Both would be against board rules.

It's just a statement of fact.