Day 2 of Marshal Law in Canada

[Binger]

The people are the force.

Are Res Ipsa and DrC part of "the people"? Is Dr Shades?

Are you?

If the answer is that some are, and some aren't how are we to decide who is of the elect and who is not?

Res and Shades are people.

[Moksha]

You are now under Mountie Law. Constable Dudley Do-Right requires that you unpark your truck from the roadway. We will forward your payments from Koch Industries to the Brighton Beach Bank as per Mr. Koch's instructions. Ask for Grigori.

[Binger]

You are now under Mountie Law. Constable Dudley Do-Right requires that you unpark your truck from the roadway. We will forward your payments from Koch Industries to the Brighton Beach Bank as per Mr. Koch's instructions. Ask for Grigori.

WTF are you talking about?

[Moksha]

You are now under Mountie Law. Constable Dudley Do-Right requires that you unpark your truck from the roadway. We will forward your payments from Koch Industries to the Brighton Beach Bank as per Mr. Koch's instructions. Ask for Grigori.

WTF are you talking about?

Google Search is available for you to learn about any unfamiliar concepts.

[Binger]

WTF are you talking about?

Google Search is available for you to learn about any unfamiliar concepts.

That is it? You were talking about google search? Christ.

[Res Ipsa]

Are Res Ipsa and DrC part of "the people"? Is Dr Shades?

Are you?

If the answer is that some are, and some aren't how are we to decide who is of the elect and who is not?

Res and Shades are people.

I am. I think. ***sidelong glance at Shades***

[Chap]

The people are the force.

Are Res Ipsa and DrC part of "the people"? Is Dr Shades?

Are you?

If the answer is that some are, and some aren't how are we to decide who is of the elect and who is not?

Res and Shades are people.

So, subject to correction, I shall take that as a 'yes' to my question "Are Res Ipsa and DrC part of "the people"? Is Dr Shades?'

A pretty heterogenous bunch, 'the people'. How can we ever be sure that the action of a small group like some truckers blocking a road represents 'the people' in any meaningful sense?

[Binger]

Are Res Ipsa and DrC part of "the people"? Is Dr Shades?

Are you?

If the answer is that some are, and some aren't how are we to decide who is of the elect and who is not?

Res and Shades are people.

So, subject to correction, I shall take that as a 'yes' to my question "Are Res Ipsa and DrC part of "the people"? Is Dr Shades?'

A pretty heterogenous bunch, 'the people'. How can we ever be sure that the action of a small group like some truckers blocking a road represents 'the people' in any meaningful sense?

Oh. I see. Your question was stupid and loaded. And now you are attempting to extrapolate some nonsense from your nonsense. But you got more dollars than sense. Hey, the good thing here is that thread is also homophonic, so be sure and include that too.

[Chap]

So, subject to correction, I shall take that as a 'yes' to my question "Are Res Ipsa and DrC part of "the people"? Is Dr Shades?'

A pretty heterogenous bunch, 'the people'. How can we ever be sure that the action of a small group like some truckers blocking a road represents 'the people' in any meaningful sense?

Oh. I see. Your question was stupid and loaded. And now you are attempting to extrapolate some nonsense from your nonsense. But you got more dollars than sense. Hey, the good thing here is that thread is also homophonic, so be sure and include that too.

Not at all. My point is that the idea of "the people" as a collective in the sense that you have used it here:

But one thing I know is that rebelnews.com will continue to do is to try and fan this temper tantrum by a tiny minority of Canadians into a revolution. They are the force behind the protests, right?

I can't tell if you know Rebel News is the force or if you asking if Rebel News is the force. I do not know if they are. I do not know enough about them to say they are or they are not.

My belief (not something I know), and I am not there, is that the media is not a force here. The people are the force. If there is any force it would happen with or without Rebel News.

is not a very meaningful or clear concept - since it presumably includes both the small number of persons blocking roads, and the large number of Canadians opposed to their doing so.

[Binger]

Oh. I see. Your question was stupid and loaded. And now you are attempting to extrapolate some nonsense from your nonsense. But you got more dollars than sense. Hey, the good thing here is that thread is also homophonic, so be sure and include that too.

Not at all. My point is that the idea of "the people" as a collective in the sense that you have used it here:

I can't tell if you know Rebel News is the force or if you asking if Rebel News is the force. I do not know if they are. I do not know enough about them to say they are or they are not.

My belief (not something I know), and I am not there, is that the media is not a force here. The people are the force. If there is any force it would happen with or without Rebel News.

is not a very meaningful or clear concept - since it presumably includes both the small number of persons blocking roads, and the large number of Canadians opposed to their doing so.

There is also a large number of people that support their doing so.