Fox News Tried Going After Denmark.

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
Post Reply
Gunnar
God
Posts: 3016
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 6:32 pm
Location: California

Re: Fox News Tried Going After Denmark.

Post by Gunnar »

canpakes wrote:
Sat Jan 18, 2025 5:41 pm
Hound of Heaven wrote:
Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:03 pm
A fire captain in Denmark earns approximately 560,000 DKK ($80,000). Taxes on 560,000 DKK include State Taxes of 66,000 DKK ($9,000). Municipal Tax: 139,000 DKK ($19,000). Labor Tax: 44,000 DKK ($6,000). Church tax amounts to 6000 DKK ($800). The fire captain's salary of $80,000 translates to a take-home pay of $45,200 in Denmark. From the $45,200 take home pay, the captain is still required to pay a 25% VAT on all sales in Denmark, with the exception of fuel, which is taxed at 59%. If the captain wishes to purchase a new car for the family, the captain will incur approximately 25% VAT along with an 85% tax on any vehicle valued over $10,000. So nothing in Denmark is actually free, is it? Oh, and if the fire captain can truly manage to buy a car, gas is $8 a gallon.

Denmark's health care system is not entirely "free." They are still responsible for the costs of portion dental care, certain medications, and some specialist visits that are not covered.
Free healthcare is a misnomer, for certain. But that Danish Fire Captain has the freedom of mind of knowing that an unexpected medical situation won’t throw his family into bankruptcy.

Right now, our family pays near as much monthly for a healthcare plan as it does for our mortgage (the difference between the two is $38), and there’s no guarantee that even that will keep us from a financial crisis should any one of us become quite sick.
Of course it is true that the healthcare is not really free, even in Denmark. It is paid for via taxation, but healthcare costs in Denmark are a much smaller percentage of its GDP than in the U.S., though higher than the average in the EU. The important thing is that in almost all cases there is no point of usage costs for medical needs and emergencies, and Danes are not in danger of bankruptcy because of unexpected and even minor health emergencies as is the case for many, if not most, Americans. But even Danes admit that their system is not without deficiencies and can benefit from certain improvements.

One unacceptable feature of Denmark is that it has an official, state sponsored religion which is largely funded by taxation. However, one can exempt oneself from having to pay the Kirkeskat (church tax) by resigning from the state supported Lutheran Church. https://www.frinans.dk/kirkeskat/
What is church tax?
Church tax is a membership fee you pay when you are a member of the national church.

You become a member of the Danish Evangelical Lutheran Church when you are baptized.

If you are not baptized, you therefore do not pay church tax.

Simple.

However, you only pay the tax if you are liable to pay tax in Denmark at the same time.
Another aggravating feature of Denmark could be the very high tax rate for purchasing a car. However, having lived in Denmark for 2.5 years I realized it is unnecessary for most people to own a car, especially if one lives in a large urban center (like Copenhagen, for example). For one thing, the traffic congestion is already bad and aggravating enough, without everyone owning their own car. To minimize such congestion is a big part of the justification for imposing such high sale taxes on personally owned vehicles. Besides that, the public transportation is so efficient and inexpensive that it would have been foolish to saddle myself with the expenses of owning, maintaining, fueling a and insuring a personal vehicle, even if had enough money to do so (which I certainly didn't during that time). For shorter distances, my bicycle and walking were handy and perfectly adequate. For longer distances I used public transport such as buses or light rail. From anywhere in Copenhagen, the nearest bus or light rail stop was within easy walking distance, and they ran so frequently that within one and a half hours I could get from virtually anywhere in Copenhagen to anywhere else in Copenhagen (a city of more than a million people) I wanted to go--and this included the time waiting for the next bus or trolley and transfers. I could hardly have gotten to my destination faster by driving my own car, when one includes the driving time in congested traffic and the time it would take to find an unoccupied parking spot. I would have had to be nearly insane to choose to put up with the expenses of buying, fueling, maintaining, insuring and parking a vehicle, unless I needed one for my business or occupation (in which case I would have gotten a tax break, if I could show I needed it for my chosen livelihood).

Yet, in America, I acknowledge that it makes more sense to own a personal vehicle in many places, for a number of reasons, including the relative dearth of convenient and reliable public transportation, and the greater distances between important destinations. In Denmark, one can drive the whole length or width of the contiguous main portions of Denmark (such as the Jutland Peninsula and the island of Zealand) within a day, which we certainly can't do in our country. I acknowledge that I enjoy owning a car that I can conveniently use to drive anywhere I want to go in a hurry. Still, unless I am in a hurry, I usually choose to walk to any destination within my community or the nearest community bordering it rather than drive to it in my car. I also sometimes use my monthly pass for our local public transit system which costs only $10 per month, which is a lot cheaper than driving my car, even though it is a plug-in hybrid. I can normally live with the fact the that buses arrive at the nearest bus stop only once per hour. About the only time I use my car is when I'm taking my family with me, or I need to go out of town somewhere.
Last edited by Gunnar on Sun Jan 19, 2025 6:31 am, edited 2 times in total.
No precept or claim is more suspect or more likely to be false than one that can only be supported by invoking the claim of Divine authority for it--no matter who or what claims such authority.
Gunnar
God
Posts: 3016
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 6:32 pm
Location: California

Re: Fox News Tried Going After Denmark.

Post by Gunnar »

Here is what I think is an objective and honest comparison between the Danish and American healthcare systems.

Health and Infrastructure in the U.S. and Denmark: A Comparison

Even the Danish healthcare system is not perfect nor deserving of being exempt from all criticism, but here are a few quotes from the article:
Today, the United States remains the only industrialized country in the world that fails to provide universal healthcare for all citizens. A complicated system presently begging for reform, American healthcare is the source of innumerable issues for many — both those with and without coverage. These issues are not limited to the domain of health care, but rather ripple out, with far-reaching influence on quality of life, psychological stability, and fundamental happiness for society at large.

Now, let’s paint a very different picture. Imagine a place of equity and inherent trust, of civility and interdependence rather than competition and angst. Visualize unlimited access to adequate healthcare, high standards of living, and generalized harmoniousness between people and state. Think of free education, sufficient maternity leave, and a culturally promoted balance between work and life. Add 4.5 million bicycles to an already people-centric society, and you have Denmark! A small, rather unassuming Northern European nation notoriously known for being the “happiest country in the world,” Denmark is clearly doing something very, very right.
However, it is important to understand that Denmark, a small, relatively homogenous country of 5 million, will never compare to the U.S., a multicultural mixing pot of nearly 320 million. The specific structure of Danish society may not be replicable on a grand scale, but the tenets it stands for can certainly inspire us to move in a positive direction.

A Northern European archipelago of over 400 islands situated within the Baltic and North Seas, Denmark is defined by deeply rooted principles of solidarity, egalitarianism, progressiveness, and collectivism. Their welfare model declares that all citizens have equal rights to social security, ensuring that healthcare and education are free for all citizens. Access to these rights are achieved through relatively high taxation, which is supported rather than resented, as citizens understand that their contribution to welfare is essential to its functioning.

Denmark’s welfare system plays a central role in mediating affairs between citizen and state. The system is built on trust, both in each other and the government — 90% of Danes vote, and participation in politics is considered crucial in the maintenance of democracy. Conversely, only roughly 50% of Americans participated in the recent controversial presidential election, a statistic reflecting the apathetic state of the U.S. populace.
Simone Thirstup-Andersen, a Danish student currently studying abroad at UC Irvine, explained that “having free education, universal healthcare, and a bike-based society are paramount,” and that “Danes have every reason to be happy because they have innumerable opportunities if they choose to take them.”
No precept or claim is more suspect or more likely to be false than one that can only be supported by invoking the claim of Divine authority for it--no matter who or what claims such authority.
User avatar
Hound of Heaven
Priest
Posts: 304
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2023 5:13 pm

Re: Fox News Tried Going After Denmark.

Post by Hound of Heaven »

canpakes wrote:
Sat Jan 18, 2025 5:41 pm
Hound of Heaven wrote:
Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:03 pm
A fire captain in Denmark earns approximately 560,000 DKK ($80,000). Taxes on 560,000 DKK include State Taxes of 66,000 DKK ($9,000). Municipal Tax: 139,000 DKK ($19,000). Labor Tax: 44,000 DKK ($6,000). Church tax amounts to 6000 DKK ($800). The fire captain's salary of $80,000 translates to a take-home pay of $45,200 in Denmark. From the $45,200 take home pay, the captain is still required to pay a 25% VAT on all sales in Denmark, with the exception of fuel, which is taxed at 59%. If the captain wishes to purchase a new car for the family, the captain will incur approximately 25% VAT along with an 85% tax on any vehicle valued over $10,000. So nothing in Denmark is actually free, is it? Oh, and if the fire captain can truly manage to buy a car, gas is $8 a gallon.

Denmark's health care system is not entirely "free." They are still responsible for the costs of portion dental care, certain medications, and some specialist visits that are not covered.
Free healthcare is a misnomer, for certain. But that Danish Fire Captain has the freedom of mind of knowing that an unexpected medical situation won’t throw his family into bankruptcy.

Right now, our family pays near as much monthly for a healthcare plan as it does for our mortgage (the difference between the two is $38), and there’s no guarantee that even that will keep us from a financial crisis should any one of us become quite sick.
What freedom of mind does the fire captain truly possess? I don't quite understand your perspective. From his $80,000 salary, he is paying $35,000 in taxes. The captain is left with $45,000. From the $45,000, the captain will incur additional taxes, including a 25% VAT on all purchases, such as food. Lets say oer the course of a year, if the captain pays an additional $5000 in VAT taxes on goods, this results in a total tax payment of $40,000 from a $80,000 salary. Where is the freedom of thought in that tax rate?

My friend is self-employed and earns approximately $160,000 each year. For a family of four, he spends around $19,000 each year on an excellent health insurance plan. That amounts to 12% of his salary.

One of my friends works for the local city government, and their family of three contributes $380 from each paycheck for health insurance. Their family of three receives comprehensive insurance coverage for $9,500 each year, based on a salary of $68,000. In 2023, with a salary of $68,000, he faced a tax of $17,000 and, after deductions, ultimately paid $9,000. He got a refund from the government amounting to $8000. This check nearly covered his family's health insurance for the year.

My friend, who earns a $68,000 salary, enjoys a sense of freedom because he only experiences a 10% to 15% deduction from his income. In contrast, the fire captain in Denmark faces taxes exceeding 45%.
User avatar
Gadianton
God
Posts: 5331
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:56 pm
Location: Elsewhere

Re: Fox News Tried Going After Denmark.

Post by Gadianton »

Hound, it sounds like you're a libertarian. Why wouldn't that same logic equally apply to any "democrat" solution to a problem, such as unions or traditional infrastructure (stimulus) spending?
Social distancing has likely already begun to flatten the curve...Continue to research good antivirals and vaccine candidates. Make everyone wear masks. -- J.D. Vance
User avatar
Hound of Heaven
Priest
Posts: 304
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2023 5:13 pm

Re: Fox News Tried Going After Denmark.

Post by Hound of Heaven »

Gadianton wrote:
Sun Jan 19, 2025 2:52 pm
Hound, it sounds like you're a libertarian. Why wouldn't that same logic equally apply to any "democrat" solution to a problem, such as unions or traditional infrastructure (stimulus) spending?
My previous post is unrelated to whether someone identifies as a democrat, libertarian, or conservative, I'm simply highlighting that the fire captain may not possess the level of "freedom of mind "that Canpakes believes tge captain does. If my understanding is accurate and the fire captain spends half the year working solely to cover taxes, how does that align with the concept of "freedom of mind?"

I recognize that $80,000 isn't actually $68,000, but for the purposes of comparison in this context, it's sufficiently similar. A fire captain in Denmark, employed by the government, earns $80,000 and pays $40,000 in taxes. In contrast, my friend, also a government worker, makes $68,000 and pays $17,000 in taxes. After deductions and receiving a $8,000 refund from the government, my friend ultimately pays only $9,000 in taxes, which is 13% of $68,000. If you consider his $9000 in taxes along with his $9500 in comprehensive insurance for the year, the total would be significantly lower than what the fire captain in Denmark is paying, wouldn't you agree?

What is the political aspect of what I just explained? Are you suggesting that American democrats are eager to part with 50% of their hard-earned money as long as they receive a sense of assurance that the government is willing to spoon feed them what they desire?
User avatar
canpakes
God
Posts: 8268
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:25 am

Re: Fox News Tried Going After Denmark.

Post by canpakes »

Hound of Heaven wrote:
Sun Jan 19, 2025 1:01 pm
canpakes wrote:
Sat Jan 18, 2025 5:41 pm


Free healthcare is a misnomer, for certain. But that Danish Fire Captain has the freedom of mind of knowing that an unexpected medical situation won’t throw his family into bankruptcy.

Right now, our family pays near as much monthly for a healthcare plan as it does for our mortgage (the difference between the two is $38), and there’s no guarantee that even that will keep us from a financial crisis should any one of us become quite sick.
What freedom of mind does the fire captain truly possess? I don't quite understand your perspective.
As stated previously - the peace of mind that their family isn’t forced into medical debt or bankruptcy if a serious healthcare situation arises.
My friend is self-employed and earns approximately $160,000 each year. For a family of four, he spends around $19,000 each year on an excellent health insurance plan. That amounts to 12% of his salary.
That’s great. That doesn’t sound like a median salary example and you’re not providing a breakdown for whatever their healthcare insurance covers, any deductibles or out-of-pocket costs, or for how many family members are included.
One of my friends works for the local city government, and their family of three contributes $380 from each paycheck for health insurance. Their family of three receives comprehensive insurance coverage for $9,500 each year, based on a salary of $68,000. In 2023, with a salary of $68,000, he faced a tax of $17,000 and, after deductions, ultimately paid $9,000. He got a refund from the government amounting to $8000. This check nearly covered his family's health insurance for the year
That’s great. Sounds like your friend has a nice benefit given through his government job.
My friend, who earns a $68,000 salary, enjoys a sense of freedom because he only experiences a 10% to 15% deduction from his income.
Good for your friend.

Anecdotes aside, all of these friends still have the same worry that I mentioned above about medical bankruptcy that your Danish Fire Captain will never experience. And that’s before any other differences are considered, such as type of coverage and limits, number of individuals covered, deductibles and out-off-pocket costs, availability of plans through an employer, or any other non-healthcare differences between the Danish and American models of healthcare, childcare, retirement, education, social services, transit infrastructure or culture.

Anyhow, the Danish system isn’t necessarily scalable or applicable to other countries. Here’s a nice, short article that mentions as much:

https://denmark.dk/society-and-business ... fare-state
User avatar
Gadianton
God
Posts: 5331
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:56 pm
Location: Elsewhere

Re: Fox News Tried Going After Denmark.

Post by Gadianton »

If you consider his $9000 in taxes along with his $9500 in comprehensive insurance for the year, the total would be significantly lower than what the fire captain in Denmark is paying, wouldn't you agree?
What is the political aspect of what I just explained?
The political aspect is that you seem to be arguing that the market solves for life and health planning better than government, which is fine if you believe that. I'm not taking a position here, I'm just pointing out that's it's a libertarianish viewpoint.
Are you suggesting that American democrats are eager to part with 50% of their hard-earned money as long as they receive a sense of assurance that the government is willing to spoon feed them what they desire?
You sound like my right-wing friend. This is a typical libertarian/right-wing insult -- that Democrats want high taxes and for the government to take care of everybody. Apparently Democrats are eager to part with more money in taxes in order to have social security and Obamacare. Per your friend's experiences, Obamacare must have been a big mistake since private insurance is so cheap and effective. For the sake of this thread, I'm not disputing any of this, I'm just pointing out that yes, Democrats have traditionally been pro social safety net, and it's hard to believe that you are a lifelong Democrat. I mean, if you think the government does not provide for life and health issues as well as the free market, then it seems like you should be an old-school fiscal Republican.

The "freedom of mind" argument is an even greater libertarian talking point. I happen to be sympathetic, and it's why I have called myself a libertarian by nature in the past. Maybe more on that later.

Comparing Denmark to here would take a lengthier analysis. Who is "better off" in material outcome (skirting questions about freedom of mind for now) would come down to who provides social benefits more efficiently, the government or private industry. So we'd have to look at both scenarios and determine which situation is over or under insuring. The fact that your friend seems to be doing better than somebody in Denmark misses the point that the right comparison is between the average person in Denmark vs. the average person in America. I don't have an opinion on this, I'm just pointing out that this is the right comparison.
Social distancing has likely already begun to flatten the curve...Continue to research good antivirals and vaccine candidates. Make everyone wear masks. -- J.D. Vance
User avatar
canpakes
God
Posts: 8268
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:25 am

Re: Fox News Tried Going After Denmark.

Post by canpakes »

Gadianton wrote:
Sun Jan 19, 2025 9:08 pm
Are you suggesting that American democrats are eager to part with 50% of their hard-earned money as long as they receive a sense of assurance that the government is willing to spoon feed them what they desire?
You sound like my right-wing friend. This is a typical libertarian/right-wing insult -- that Democrats want high taxes and for the government to take care of everybody.
To that point, I’m not sure that only Democratic Party voters find these things valuable for the sake of community and family:

- Paid parental leave and child benefits
- Subsidized daycare centers
- Primary school, high school, vocational high school, business school as well as further- and higher education
- Student grants during youth-, further- and higher education
- Healthcare - general practitioners, hospitals and specialty care
- Psychological care for youth age 18-24
- Unemployment-, disability- and sickness benefits
- Housing allowance (rented housing)
- Early retirement for persons with disabilities
- State retirement pension (67+)
- Elderly care

… all of which are part of the social safely net that our Fire Captain in Denmark is funding with his/her taxes. Given Hound’s income and tax breakdown, there is serious value being provided by the Danish example.

It’s certainly anyone’s right to consider life to be a combat sport occasionally augmented by genetic or social luck, but often rewarded with eventual frailty and debt. It would, however, seem somewhat advantageous to realize that we are gifted in the modern age to be more compassionate and caring to our fellow members of our species.
User avatar
Gadianton
God
Posts: 5331
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:56 pm
Location: Elsewhere

Re: Fox News Tried Going After Denmark.

Post by Gadianton »

Canpakes wrote:... all of which are part of the social safely net that our Fire Captain in Denmark is funding with his/her taxes. Given Hound’s income and tax breakdown, there is serious value being provided by the Danish example.
Not only do you get all that, but according to the Heritage foundation, Denmark is 8th in the world for overall economic freedom score, even though their tax burden score is quite low. That seems to suggest that they are getting what they pay for and then some, which isn't surprising considering their government integrity score about ties with Norway for first place. The US doesn't even make the first scroll page.

Now for Ajax, Markk, Subs, and Ceebs, who don't get out much if we're to go by their comments on this board, this is the same Heritage Foundation of Project 2025 fame that wants to eliminate government and install Donald Trump as a dictator, and so there is no possible liberal bias.

https://www.heritage.org/index/pages/all-country-scores

I too am at a loss for why Heritage thinks they are going to improve the rankings of the USA by installing a dictator whose priorities are fraud, meme coins, and every conceivable avenue of personal corruption and new spin on telling lies, but maybe there's a verse in Leviticus somewhere that I'm missing?
Social distancing has likely already begun to flatten the curve...Continue to research good antivirals and vaccine candidates. Make everyone wear masks. -- J.D. Vance
User avatar
Hound of Heaven
Priest
Posts: 304
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2023 5:13 pm

Re: Fox News Tried Going After Denmark.

Post by Hound of Heaven »

canpakes wrote:
Mon Jan 20, 2025 1:28 am
Gadianton wrote:
Sun Jan 19, 2025 9:08 pm


You sound like my right-wing friend. This is a typical libertarian/right-wing insult -- that Democrats want high taxes and for the government to take care of everybody.
To that point, I’m not sure that only Democratic Party voters find these things valuable for the sake of community and family:

- Paid parental leave and child benefits
- Subsidized daycare centers
- Primary school, high school, vocational high school, business school as well as further- and higher education
- Student grants during youth-, further- and higher education
- Healthcare - general practitioners, hospitals and specialty care
- Psychological care for youth age 18-24
- Unemployment-, disability- and sickness benefits
- Housing allowance (rented housing)
- Early retirement for persons with disabilities
- State retirement pension (67+)
- Elderly care

... all of which are part of the social safely net that our Fire Captain in Denmark is funding with his/her taxes. Given Hound’s income and tax breakdown, there is serious value being provided by the Danish example.

It’s certainly anyone’s right to consider life to be a combat sport occasionally augmented by genetic or social luck, but often rewarded with eventual frailty and debt. It would, however, seem somewhat advantageous to realize that we are gifted in the modern age to be more compassionate and caring to our fellow members of our species.
Not every democrat is invested in your comprehensive social safety net from birth to death. I propose that a significant factor in our loss in 2024 is the new Democratic agenda, spearheaded by progressives, which seeks to persuade Americans that a comprehensive safety net from birth to death is the sole path to genuine happiness in our nation.

Allow me to reiterate this point, as it is crucial for our success in future elections. An all encompassing social safety net that intrudes into daily life is unlikely to aid Democrats in securing electoral victories in America. Democrats, independents, and conservatives alike are a fiercely independent and self-sufficient group that does not appreciate being dictated to! This leads me to my second point regarding the reasons for our loss in the 2024 election. Democrats, guided by progressive ideas, faced defeat because they believed they wielded sufficient influence over the American populace. They assumed they could effectively dissuade individuals from voting for Trump by asserting that only a complete fool would support him. The progressives' ability to persuade didn't unfold as they had anticipated, did it? As progressives focused their criticism on Trump around the clock, he was actively contributing to the creation of an alternative media landscape that now wields greater influence than traditional media has in the last half-century.

I'm not suggesting that a safety net isn't necessary or that it's inherently a negative concept, just the opposite. What I am expressing is that, under the influence of progressives, a possible mandatory, all encompassing social safety net has led to our decline as a party. They aimed to persuade all Americans that genuine happiness and daily comfort were unattainable without their support throughout life. The American people turned down the progressive effort to redefine happiness for everyday Americans. It appears that Americans continue to embrace the uncertainties that come with freedom rather than opting for the "assured safety" provided by the government. They chose a convicted felon instead of a party that promised to provide for everyone. That alone speaks volumes about how Americans view freedom.

I hope that starting today, my party will focus on the issues that truly matter to American voters in the 2028 election. We are distinct from Europe and will always remain so. A strong safety net is beneficial for Americans, but compelling everyone to pay excessively for it won't be accepted here in America. Americans desire choices, yet the Democrats, guided by the progressive agenda, seem to have overlooked this important factor. The far left seeks to impose policy through force and coercion, yet they believe they alone possess the understanding of what all Americans require to lead a fulfilling life. The strategy did not succeed at all.
Post Reply