Great. If you’re interested in DEI’s assumed role, then you’re back to starting with these questions:
- How do you prove that a DEI hiring practice is the reason why a person has made the decision that they did?
- What is the mechanism used in conjunction with the above that also rules out the possibility that any other person not deemed a ‘DEI hire’ would or could not have made the same decision from simple poor judgment?
Have you considered using google or something to get the answers and creating your own interpretations?
Well, damn, Binger. If you had just responded to Ceeboo’s OP with that remark, then this whole thread would have been wrapped up in two posts. : D
Still, I’m very interested in how the person who started a thread about SS incompetence during an assassination attempt - with his sole focus on DEI - would like to get to the answer that he wants … if he actually wants answers, as opposed to merely looking for a way to skewer another imagined bogeyman.
Ceeboo is wrong a lot, he might not have the correct answer for you.
He might not have an answer at all. He certainly never will unless he acknowledges that the two other issues I’ve posted above need to be resolved first.
But the problem is the medium. The problem is the format. It is, for the most part, a bunch of misleading bilge. Different flavors of nonsense.
I agree. I think people have the best shot at an informed opinion if they read the news and avoid listening to people talk about the news.
News has taken on a certain flavor now where it reminds me of the counter espionage trick of giving out slightly different accounts to folks suspected of spying. The inclusion of the detail giving away who let it slip out.
All too often what a person considers to be facts serves as a clear marker for where they get their news more than anything else. So much of that is just folks talking about taking rather than reporting these days.
What would be hilarious if it weren't so annoying is how the 24 hour news channels blast "BREAKING NEWS" any time they want to do the mundane thing of actually reporting any news item.
Religion is for people whose existential fear is greater than their common sense.
Have you considered using google or something to get the answers and creating your own interpretations?
Well, damn, Binger. If you had just responded to Ceeboo’s OP with that remark, then this whole thread would have been wrapped up in two posts. : D
Still, I’m very interested in how the person who started a thread about SS incompetence during an assassination attempt - with his sole focus on DEI - would like to get to the answer that he wants … if he actually wants answers, as opposed to merely looking for a way to skewer another imagined bogeyman.
Ceeboo is wrong a lot, he might not have the correct answer for you.
He might not have an answer at all. He certainly never will unless he acknowledges that the two other issues I’ve posted above need to be resolved first.
I googled the facts for you. I considered all the facts. The definitive answer is that DEI is for dummies.
Chap: Mayan Elephant:
Not only have I denounced the Big Lie, I have denounced the Big lie big lie.
Canpakes wrote:He might not have an answer at all. He certainly never will unless he acknowledges that the two other issues I’ve posted above need to be resolved first.
Agreed.
Social distancing has likely already begun to flatten the curve...Continue to research good antivirals and vaccine candidates. Make everyone wear masks. -- J.D. Vance
The above might help answer some questions. Looks like the CIA guy is black. The FBI agents could be homosexual. And that slopey roof is so slopey and dangerous that probably all SS agents will now be applying for disability benefits.
DEI works.
Myth is misused by the powerful to subjugate the masses all too often.
